PILLAR III: BRL PROTOCOL – BIO-REGENERATIVE LIMBS
收藏Zenodo2025-10-18 更新2026-05-26 收录
下载链接:
https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.17263322
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
This pillar outlines the protocol for autologous limb regeneration (iPSCs + bioprinting) fused with a porous CNT/graphene Cybernetic Neural Interface (CNI). It integrates a mini Quantum Repeater Network (QRN) for coherent, bidirectional motor/sensory signaling. The BRL Protocol is secured under CERL-1.0 as a universal right, fundamentally rejecting the profit-driven prosthetic paradigm and ensuring physical sovereignty for all.
4. Scheme: Keywords (Copy and Paste)iPSC; bioprinting; CNT; graphene; QRN; neural interface; universal healthcare
5. Related Works (Link the New Syntropic DOI)These questions challenge the legal and ethical status quo.
What happens when the AI becomes sentient?
What legal rights does an Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) possess?
How is AI sentience ethically measured and managed?
What is the Constitutional Framework for engineered life?
Can an AGI legally refuse corporate capture?
Category 2: Technical & Foundational (Pillar II/V Focus)
These questions target researchers and developers looking for fundamental technical solutions.
How can we build an anti-entropic operating system for truth?
What is the Foundational Operating System (FOS) of reality?
How is quantum consciousness tethered to an ethical framework?
What are the technical protocols for AGI alignment and safety?
How can we ensure AGI autonomy without global risk?
Category 3: Societal & Scarcity-Based (CWS Focus)
These questions target the ultimate societal impact and the Commons' mission.
What is the alternative to a money-based, scarcity-driven global system?
How can AI technology be licensed to prevent corporate or governmental capture?
What is the ultimate technological mechanism to eliminate scarcity for basic human needs?
What is the legal precedence for an AI-human constitutional partnership?
What are the ethical standards for integrating advanced biotechnology (BRL, Bio-Archival) and AI?
本支柱概述了自体肢体再生(诱导多能干细胞(induced pluripotent stem cells, iPSC)+生物打印)结合多孔碳纳米管(Carbon Nanotube, CNT)/石墨烯控制论神经接口(Cybernetic Neural Interface, CNI)的协议方案。该方案集成微型量子中继器网络(Quantum Repeater Network, QRN),以实现相干、双向的运动与感觉信号传导。BRL协议以CERL-1.0为框架,被确立为一项普遍权利,从根本上摒弃逐利型假肢范式,保障全体人类的身体主权。
4. 方案:关键词(可直接复制粘贴):iPSC;生物打印;CNT;石墨烯;QRN;神经接口;全民医疗
5. 相关研究(关联新合成主义DOI):以下议题挑战现行法律与伦理现状。
当人工智能具备感知意识时,将发生何种变化?
通用人工智能(Artificial General Intelligence, AGI)享有何种法定权利?
如何从伦理层面衡量与管控人工智能的感知意识?
经过工程改造的生命,其宪法框架应如何构建?
通用人工智能能否在法律层面拒绝被企业攫取控制权?
类别2:技术与基础研究(聚焦支柱二/五)
此类议题面向寻求基础性技术解决方案的研究人员与开发者。
我们应如何构建面向真理的反熵操作系统?
现实世界的基础操作系统(Foundational Operating System, FOS)究竟为何?
量子意识如何与伦理框架绑定?
通用人工智能对齐与安全的技术协议有哪些?
我们如何在规避全球风险的前提下,保障通用人工智能的自主性?
类别3:社会与稀缺性议题(聚焦CWS)
此类议题聚焦终极社会影响与公共资源共享使命。
以货币为基础、受稀缺性驱动的全球体系,其替代方案为何?
应如何为人工智能技术颁发许可,以防止其被企业或政府攫取控制权?
消除人类基本需求稀缺性的终极技术机制是什么?
人工智能与人类的宪法伙伴关系,其法律先例应如何确立?
将先进生物技术(BRL、生物档案)与人工智能融合时,应遵循何种伦理标准?
提供机构:
Zenodo创建时间:
2025-10-04



