Der Deutsche Viktimisierungssurvey - Kumulation 2012-2017

The German Victimization Survey is a dark field survey conducted on behalf of the Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA) with the aim of collecting comprehensive information on the topics of fear of crime, victim experiences and reporting behaviour in the Federal Republic of Germany. Other focal points of the survey were fraud offences with EC and credit cards or on the Internet as well as crime-related attitudes. The study, designed as a cross-sectional survey, was first conducted in 2012 and repeated in 2017 with a slightly modified survey instrument. A representative sample of the German population aged 16 and over was interviewed in computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATI). In both surveys, the interviews were conducted in German, Turkish and Russian. The cumulative dataset presented here contains the complete data of both surveys and thus enables the measurement of changes between 2012 and 2017. Topics: 1. Number of household members aged 16 and over (fixed-network sample/total sample); household size; household type; age; age group; life satisfaction, trust; self-assessment of health status; general personal trust; institutional trust (federal government, courts, police, political parties, Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA), public prosecutor´s office). 2. Crime-related attitudes: Contact with police in the last 12 months; reason for police contact (reporting a crime, stopped on the street, questioned as a witness, accident, as a suspect, professional contact, given information or advice to get help or advice, other reason); satisfaction with treatment by police at last contact; reasons for dissatisfaction with last police contact (e.g. did not come quickly enough, not helpful enough or not at all, prejudice, etc.). ); reputation of the police among people in the personal environment (image); negative experiences with the police in the last 12 months in the personal environment; assessment of the work of the local police in fighting crime; equal treatment of rich and poor people by the local police when reporting a crime; frequency of disproportionate violence by the local police; assessment of one´s own economic situation; concerns about the deterioration of one´s own standard of living; agreement with the statement: enough people in the personal environment who take me as I am. Additional questions on justice: frequency of fair and impartial decisions by the courts; equal treatment of rich and poor people in court; frequency of wrong decisions by courts (guilty people not convicted, innocent people convicted); contact with a court in the last five years about a criminal case; time of last contact with a court about a criminal case; own role in last participation in a criminal case; satisfaction with the outcome of the case. 3. Attitudes towards punishment: Importance of different purposes in imposing punishment (deterring offenders from committing further crimes, helping offenders to lead a crime-free life, making offenders pay for their crime, making offenders pay for the harm they have done, increasing the public´s awareness of the law, protecting society from offenders); Vignette experiment: attitudes towards punishment based on different case studies for different offences (bodily harm, theft, damage to property, fraud, robbery) with regard to appropriate response options of the state, custodial sentence with or without probation, duration of custodial sentence in years/months and most appropriate conditions. 4. Attitudes towards immigration: immigration good or bad for the German economy, cultural life in Germany undermined or enriched by immigrants; Germany made a better or worse place to live by immigrants. 5. Media use: average weekly use of (internet) TV, (internet) radio, internet edition of a newspaper, printed newspaper, internet (excluding TV, radio, newspaper use); interest in different types of TV programmes (news, political magazines, other magazines, reports, documentaries, TV shows, quiz programmes, sports programmes, crime films, feature films, entertainment series, comedy programmes); reasons for TV consumption. 6. Social psychological perspectives and attitudes: Attitudes towards life and the future based on various statements (how my life turns out depends on myself, what one achieves in life is primarily a matter of fate or luck, success has to be worked hard for, when I encounter difficulties in life I often doubt my abilities, more important than all the efforts are the skills one brings, I have little control over the things that happen in my life, I only deal with tasks that are solvable, I like life to be even, I like surprises to come unexpectedly, I feel more comfortable when I know what is coming). 7. General and vocational education: highest school-leaving qualification or school-leaving qualification aspired to; highest vocational training qualification; main occupation (employment status); extent of employment. 8. Neighbourhood: size of the place of residence (municipality or city); living together in the neighbourhood (people help each other, you can trust the people in the neighbourhood, people here have no respect for law and order);Image of the neighbourhood; frequency of personal interaction with people from the neighbourhood in the last 6 months (doing something together, borrowing food, tools or something else, talking about personal matters); Disorder/Incivilities: disturbing situations in the neighbourhood (unkempt front gardens or public green spaces, demolished or dirty bus stops, mailboxes, etc.), litter such as paper or drink cans lying around, groups of young people standing around or sitting around, arguments or fights in public); frequency of these situations in one´s own neighbourhood; satisfaction with the immediate living environment; going out in the evening (frequency). 9. Internet use: use of the Internet or e-mail for private purposes; feeling of safety when using the Internet: frequency of Internet use; online banking; reasons why no online banking; shopping on the Internet; reasons why no shopping on the Internet; use of social media on the Internet; reasons why no use of social media. 10. Fear of crime: feeling safe at night in the neighbourhood; being worried by different situations (being beaten or hurt, having their home broken into, being attacked and robbed, being sexually harassed, being the victim of a terrorist attack); how much this worry affects their quality of life; how worried they are about being beaten or sexually harassed by someone in their family; how worried they are about being beaten or sexually harassed by someone in their family. fear of crime in the last seven days; worried about personal safety, safety of family members, burglary or damage to house or flat, theft of a car, theft of a car, theft of a car. (e.g. mobile phone); level of anxiety in this situation; location of incident (home, someone else´s house, workplace, school, university, public place or transport, other location); fear of crime at work or in the field; public place or transport with very many/very few people or neither; alone or accompanied during incident; frequency of incidents of this type. 11. Fear of crime specific to crime: likelihood of various incidents occurring in the next 12 months (being beaten or injured, having your home broken into, being attacked and robbed, being sexually assaulted, being the victim of a terrorist attack); behaviour to protect against crime (avoiding certain streets, places, parks, avoiding people who seem threatening, taking detours, avoiding walking alone in the dark). 12. Possession of vehicles and payment cards: privately owned or used vehicles (bicycle, moped, moped, scooter, motorbike, car, van or other motorised vehicle) and payment cards (credit card, EC card or Girocard, bank card) in the last five years. 13. Victimisations: Experience of crime in the last five years: Residential burglary (theft); attempted residential burglary (theft); vehicle theft (bicycle, moped, moped, scooter, motorbike, car, van, other vehicle); goods or services fraud; payment card abuse; victimisation on the Internet through malware (viruses, Trojans, etc.); phishing, forged payment cards (credit card, debit card, bank customer card, etc.). ); phishing, fake e-mail, pharming, fake website); attempted or actual robbery; victim of other theft without violence (personal theft); victim of assault with weapon (tear gas, pepper spray, knife, gun, other); victim of assault without weapons: hitting, kicking, choking, burns, other assault). Questions on crimes experienced in the last 12 months: Follow-up questions on single incident (incidence) - only one victimisation Residential burglary(theft): Residential burglary(theft) in the last 12 months or earlier; frequency of residential burglaries in the last 12 months; incident happened in Germany; frequency of incidents in Germany; federal state; open mention to city or town recorded; use of physical force or threat of force; identical to incident in which something was taken away by force or threat of force; theft in this incident, theft insurance for one of the stolen items; police were informed about said incident; In the case of multiple victimisations, the above follow-up questions on state, etc. were asked for up to five individual incidents. Additional questions - only for the last (or only) victimisation: police were informed about the incident by the respondent, partner(s), family member(s), friend(s), other person(s), or police were on the scene; how were the police informed; report filed; person who filed report; document signed with police; reasons why incident was not reported to the police (e.g. Crime not serious, cleared up by family, reported to another office, not insured, would not have helped, fear of police, fear of retaliation); reasons for reporting (stolen property received back, because of insurance, crimes should always be reported, punishment of offender, serious crime so it would not happen again, because of loss of official documents); satisfaction with police in handling incident; reasons for dissatisfaction with police (e.g. e.g. did too little or worked too slowly, was not interested, did not keep me informed, etc.); replacement value at the last burglary (in euros); how bad was this incident for the respondent. Corresponding questions on other offences for which victimisation was affirmed: attempted housebreaking, bicycle theft, motorbike theft, motor vehicle theft (deviations: Stolen motor vehicle recovered), consumer fraud (in relation to goods, services or both, on the internet, by e-mail, other, with credit or giro card, payment card was stolen), payment card misuse (with credit, giro or bank customer card, with card payment or online banking, payment card was stolen), malware (offence identical to the incident mentioned at the beginning with regard to phishing resp. Pharming), Phishing (credit institution has informed the police), Pharming (credit institution has informed the police), Personal theft. Follow-up questions on single incident (incidence) - only one victimisation Residential burglary(theft): Residential burglary(theft) in the last 12 months or earlier; frequency of residential burglaries in the last 12 months; incident happened in Germany; frequency of incidents in Germany; federal state; open mention to city or town recorded; use of physical force or threat of force; identical to incident in which something was taken away by force or threat of force; theft in this incident, theft insurance for one of the stolen items; police were informed about said incident; Robbery: robbery or attempted robbery in the last 12 months or earlier; frequency of robbery in the last 12 months; incident paused in Germany; frequency of incidents in Germany; federal state; open mention to city or town recorded; location (own home, public, in a building); type of building (e.g. bank branch); incident occurred during work; something was stolen; theft insurance for one of the stolen items; police were informed; media report on the incident; wish for media report; rather good or rather bad that it was reported in media; reporting in newspapers (also online editions), on (internet) television, on (internet) radio, in other medium); reporting only on the incident or also on the respondent personally; assessment of reporting on own person as fair or unfair; hate crime: Reason for victim selection (victim´s religion, sexual orientation, sex, gender identity, disability, skin colour, origin, age, political world view, social status, other reason (open naming)). Additional questions - only for the last (or only) victimisation: police were informed about the incident by the respondent, partner, family member, friend, other person, or police were on the scene; how were the police informed; report filed; person who filed report; document signed at the police station; reasons why the incident was not reported to the police (e.g. (e.g. crime not serious, cleared up by family, reported to another authority, not insured, would not have helped, fear of police, fear of retaliation); reasons for reporting (to get compensation from offender or insurance, crime should always be reported, punishment of offender, serious crime so that it does not happen again, because of loss of official documents); satisfaction with police in dealing with incident; reasons for dissatisfaction with police (e.g. did too little or did not do enough); reasons for dissatisfaction with police (e.g. did too little or did too little); reasons for dissatisfaction with police (e.g. did too little or did too little); reasons for dissatisfaction with police (e.g. did too little or did too little). (e.g. did too little or worked too slowly, was not interested, did not keep me informed, etc.); replacement value of stolen items (in euros); number of perpetrators involved in the last robbery; interviewee was able to see the perpetrator or one or more perpetrators; familiarity of the perpetrator(s) (at least one perpetrator related, at least one perpetrator from acquaintances or friends, at least one perpetrator known by sight, all perpetrators unknown); perpetrator was armed or at least one of the perpetrators had a weapon. at least one of the perpetrators had a weapon; type of weapon (firearm, knife, other sharp object, blunt object, other weapon or object); weapon was used (also only threat); respondent suffered injuries in the last robbery; medical care for the injuries suffered; how bad was the last incident for the respondent. Assault: in the last 12 months or earlier; frequency of assault in the last 12 months; incident happened in Germany; frequency of incidents in Germany; federal state; open mention to city or town recorded; location; number of perpetrators; type of assault (was beaten, choked, burned, sprayed with irritant gas, stabbed with knife or similar, injured with firearm or other weapon, etc.). injured, injured with firearm or other weapon, other assault); perpetrator/at least one of the perpetrators also had a weapon; police were informed; media report on the incident; wish for media report; rather good or rather bad that it was reported in media; reporting in newspapers (also online editions), on (internet) television, on (internet) radio, in other medium); reporting only on the incident or also on the respondent personally; assessment of reporting on own person as fair or unfair; hate crime: Reason for victim selection (victim´s religion, sexual orientation, sex, gender identity, disability, skin colour, origin, age, political world view, social status, other reason (open naming)). Additional questions - only for the last (or only) victimisation: police were informed about the incident by the respondent, partner, family member, friend, other person, or police were on the scene; how were the police informed; report filed; person who filed report; document signed with police; reasons why incident was not reported to police (e.g. offence not serious, resolved by family, reported to another agency, insured, would not have helped, fear of police, fear of retaliation) reasons for reporting (to get compensation from the perpetrator or the insurance company, crimes should always be reported, punishment of the perpetrator, serious crime so that it does not happen again, because of loss of official documents); satisfaction with the police in dealing with the incident; reasons for dissatisfaction with the police (e.g. did too little or worked too slowly, was not interested, did not keep me informed, etc.); respondent was able to see the perpetrator or one or more of the perpetrators; familiarity of perpetrator(s) (one was spouse or former spouse, partner, at least one perpetrator related, at least one perpetrator known from acquaintances or friends, at least one perpetrator known by sight, all perpetrators unknown); injuries sustained in last assault; medical care for injuries sustained; how bad was the last incident for the respondent. Demography: sex; highest level of education (recoded); educational attainment: ISCED-97); employment status; marital status; steady partner; living with partner; number of children in the household up to and including 15 years or 16 and 17 years in the household; change in number of persons in the household in the last 5 years; citizenship; other citizenship; second citizenship; citizenship non-German; country of birth; year of immigration; country of birth of mother and father; year of immigration of father and mother; all grandparents born in the FRG, GDR or former German eastern territories; at least one grandparent born in Turkey or the former Soviet Union; migration background; first/second generation migration background; own migration experience; migration experience of father, mother, parents; religious denomination; net household income; federal state; equipment telecommunications media and accessibility: Number of landline telephone numbers in the household; accessibility (yesterday, the day before yesterday, 3 days ago); accessibility via other telephone (mobile or landline) landline); accessibility via other telephone (yesterday, the day before, 3 days ago); number of active mobile phone numbers of other household members (at least 16 years old). Additionally coded was: Participation: survey wave; participation in modules (Module 1 Wave 1: Fear of Crime (only collected in 2012), Module 1 Wave 1: Media Use (only collected in 2012), Module 1: Social Psychological Perspectives and Attitudes, Module 2: Crime-Related Attitudes, Module 3: Disorder/ Incivilities, Module 4: Feeling of Safety with Internet Use and Model 5: Crime-Specific Fear of Crime; participation justice questions (not included in Wave 1 (2012); vignette set 2012; vignette set 2017. Sample identifier: sample (basic sample, boost sample, onomastic sample); flag variable for states for boost cases; identifier onomastic cases; flag variable for (potential) onomastic sample (only for 2012); fixed or mobile phone sample; main study or conversion study. Weights: selection probabilities (Wave 1 only, e.g. base sample/boost sample case number normalised persons/households, onomastic sample persons/households; design weights, extrapolation factors; stratification of sample for complex-sample design weighting; auxiliary variables. Paradata: Postcode (or parts thereof) available or missing information; Interview language (onomastics sample); Baseline and top-up: language of final outcome contact; Interview language, summarised; Interview identifier; Interview start allowed; Interview date (day, month, year); Interview start (hour, minute); Total interview duration in seconds. Interview identifier; sex of interviewer; age groups of interviewer; duration of interviewer staff membership in years; number of realised interviews per interviewer. Derived variables on victimisation, prevalences (12-month prevalences, 5-year prevalences) and reporting rate.

《德国受害调查》是受联邦刑事警察局（BKA）委托开展的暗场调查，旨在全面收集德意志联邦共和国境内民众对犯罪的恐惧程度、受害经历及报案行为相关信息。本次调查的其他重点议题包括涉及欧盟支付卡、信用卡或网络的诈骗犯罪，以及与犯罪相关的态度取向。本研究为横断面调查，于2012年首次实施，并于2017年使用略有调整的调查工具重复开展。调查以16岁及以上德国人口为代表性抽样框，采用计算机辅助电话访谈（Computer-Assisted Telephone Interviews, CATI）方式进行。两次调查均使用德语、土耳其语及俄语开展访谈。本次公开的累积数据集包含两次调查的全部原始数据，可用于分析2012年至2017年间的相关变化。

本次调查涵盖以下13大类议题：
1. 人口统计学与基本态度：16岁及以上家庭成员数量（固定电话抽样样本/总样本）、家庭规模、家庭类型、年龄、年龄组别、生活满意度、信任感、健康状况自评、个人总体信任度、机构信任度（含联邦政府、法院、警方、政党、联邦刑事警察局（BKA）、检察院）。
2. 涉罪态度：过去12个月内与警方的接触情况、接触警方的原因（报案、街头盘查、作为证人询问、事故处理、作为嫌疑人接受问询、公务接触、寻求信息或援助建议、其他原因）、末次与警方接触时对警方处置的满意度、末次接触不满的原因（如出警过慢、协助不足或完全未提供协助、存在偏见等）、个人社交圈中对警方的评价（形象）、过去12个月内个人社交圈中与警方相关的负面经历、对当地警方打击犯罪工作的评价、当地警方在报案时对贫富群体的公平对待情况、当地警方过度使用暴力的发生频率、自身经济状况自评、对自身生活水平下降的担忧程度、对“个人社交圈中有足够多的人能接纳真实的我”这一表述的认同度。司法相关附加问题：法院作出公正裁决的频率、法院对贫富群体的平等对待情况、法院误判的发生频率（有罪者未定罪、无辜者被定罪）、过去5年内涉及刑事案件的法院接触情况、末次刑事案件法院接触的时间、本人在末次刑事案件参与中的角色、对案件处理结果的满意度。
3. 刑罚态度：刑罚不同目的的重要性排序（威慑犯罪者再次犯罪、帮助犯罪者过上无犯罪生活、让犯罪者为其罪行付出代价、让犯罪者为其所造成的损害承担责任、提升公众法律意识、保护社会免受犯罪者侵害）；情景实验（vignette实验）：针对不同犯罪类型（故意伤害、盗窃、财产损毁、诈骗、抢劫）的案例，评估民众对国家恰当处置方式的态度，包括是否适用缓刑的监禁刑、监禁刑的时长（以年/月计）及最适宜的行刑条件。
4. 移民态度：移民对德国经济的利弊评价、移民对德国文化生活是造成破坏还是带来丰富性、移民是否让德国成为更适宜居住的地方。
5. 媒体使用情况：每周平均使用（网络）电视、（网络）广播、报纸网络版、纸质报纸、互联网（不含电视、广播、报纸使用场景）的时长；对不同类型电视节目的兴趣程度（新闻、政治杂志类节目、其他杂志类节目、专题报道、纪录片、电视剧、益智节目、体育节目、犯罪题材电影、故事片、娱乐剧集、喜剧节目）；收看电视的原因。
6. 社会心理学视角与态度：基于各类表述的生活与未来态度（如“我的生活走向由自身决定”“人生成就主要取决于命运或运气”“成功需要努力奋斗”“遇到生活困境时常会怀疑自身能力”“个人天赋比所有努力都更重要”“我几乎无法掌控生活中发生的事”“我只会处理可解决的任务”“我喜欢平稳的生活”“我喜欢意外的惊喜”“当我知晓即将发生的事时会更安心”）。
7. 普通教育与职业教育：最高学历或意向学历、最高职业培训资质、主要职业（就业状态）、就业规模。
8. 社区生活：居住地点的规模（市镇或城市级别）、社区互助氛围（邻里互助、可信任邻里居民、本地居民漠视法律秩序）、社区形象、过去6个月内与邻里居民的私人互动频率（共同参与活动、借用食物或工具等物品、谈论私人事务）；社区失序/不文明行为：社区内的扰人状况（荒芜的前院或公共绿地、破旧肮脏的公交站、邮箱等）、随手丢弃的纸张或饮料罐等垃圾、成群年轻人逗留闲逛、公共场所的争吵或斗殴；此类状况在自身社区的发生频率、对当前居住环境的满意度、晚间外出的频率。
9. 互联网使用情况：私人用途的互联网或电子邮件使用情况、互联网使用安全感、互联网使用频率、网上银行使用情况、未使用网上银行的原因、网络购物情况、未进行网络购物的原因、互联网社交媒体使用情况、未使用社交媒体的原因。
10. 犯罪恐惧：夜间在社区内的安全感、对不同场景的担忧程度（遭殴打或伤害、家中被盗、遭遇袭击抢劫、遭受性骚扰、成为恐怖袭击受害者）、此类担忧对生活质量的影响程度、对家庭成员实施殴打或性骚扰的担忧程度；过去7日内的犯罪恐惧情况；对个人安全、家庭成员安全、住宅被盗或损毁、车辆盗窃、手机盗窃等的担忧程度；此类场景下的焦虑水平、事件发生地点（家中、他人住宅、工作场所、学校、大学、公共场所或交通工具、其他地点）、工作或户外场景下的犯罪恐惧、人群极多/极少或一般的公共场所/交通工具、事件发生时独自或有人陪同、此类事件的发生频率。
11. 针对性犯罪恐惧：未来12个月内各类事件的发生概率（遭殴打或受伤、家中被盗、遭遇袭击抢劫、遭受性侵犯、成为恐怖袭击受害者）、预防犯罪的行为（避开特定街道、场所、公园，避开看起来具有威胁性的人，绕道行走，避免深夜独自外出）。
12. 交通工具与支付卡持有情况：过去5年内私人拥有或使用的交通工具（自行车、轻便摩托车、踏板摩托车、机动脚踏两用车、摩托车、轿车、厢式货车或其他机动车）及支付卡（信用卡、欧洲卡（EC卡）、德国 giro转账卡（Girocard）、银行卡）的持有情况。
13. 受害经历：过去5年内的犯罪经历：住宅盗窃（窃盗）、未遂住宅盗窃、车辆盗窃（自行车、轻便摩托车、踏板摩托车、机动脚踏两用车、摩托车、轿车、厢式货车或其他车辆）、商品或服务诈骗、支付卡滥用、通过恶意软件（病毒、特洛伊木马等）遭受的网络受害、网络钓鱼（phishing）、伪造支付卡（信用卡、借记卡、银行客户卡等）、网址劫持（pharming）、虚假网站；未遂或已实施的抢劫、非暴力其他盗窃（个人盗窃）、持械袭击（使用催泪瓦斯、胡椒喷雾、刀具、枪支或其他器械）、非持械袭击（殴打、踢踹、扼颈、烧伤或其他袭击方式）。

针对过去12个月内的犯罪经历，设置了单事件（单次受害）追踪问题：
- 住宅盗窃（窃盗）：是否在过去12个月及更早发生过住宅盗窃、过去12个月内住宅盗窃的发生频率、事件是否发生在德国境内、德国境内事件的发生频率、所属联邦州、记录的开放提及城市/城镇信息、是否使用武力或武力威胁、是否属于以武力或武力威胁夺取财物的事件、本次事件中的盗窃情况、被盗物品的盗窃保险情况、是否已就该事件通知警方。针对多次受害的情况，最多针对5起独立事件询问上述州级等追踪问题。仅针对末次（或唯一）受害事件的附加问题：受访者、伴侣、家庭成员、朋友或其他人员是否已就该事件通知警方，或警方已抵达现场；警方的通知方式；是否已立案；报案人信息；与警方签署的文件；未向警方报案的原因（如案件不严重、已由家庭自行解决、已向其他机构报案、未投保、报案无济于事、惧怕警方、担心报复）；报案的原因（如追回被盗财物、保险理赔、犯罪应始终报案、惩处犯罪者、案件严重以防止再次发生、丢失官方文件）；对警方处理该事件的满意度；对警方处置不满的原因（如处置过少、行动过慢、态度冷漠、未及时告知进展等）；末次住宅盗窃的重置价值（欧元）；本次事件对受访者的严重程度。
针对确认存在受害经历的其他犯罪类型设置了对应问题：未遂入室盗窃、自行车盗窃、摩托车盗窃、机动车盗窃（补充项：被盗机动车已追回）、消费者诈骗（涉及商品、服务或两者，通过网络、电子邮件或其他渠道，使用信用卡或 giro转账卡，支付卡被盗）、支付卡滥用（使用信用卡、 giro转账卡或银行客户卡，通过卡支付或网上银行，支付卡被盗）、恶意软件攻击（与前述网络钓鱼/网址劫持事件一致的犯罪行为）、网络钓鱼（信贷机构已通知警方）、网址劫持（信贷机构已通知警方）、个人盗窃。
单事件追踪问题（仅单次受害）：
- 住宅盗窃（窃盗）：是否在过去12个月及更早发生过住宅盗窃、过去12个月内住宅盗窃的发生频率、事件是否发生在德国境内、德国境内事件的发生频率、所属联邦州、记录的开放提及城市/城镇信息、是否使用武力或武力威胁、是否属于以武力或武力威胁夺取财物的事件、本次事件中的盗窃情况、被盗物品的盗窃保险情况、是否已就该事件通知警方。
- 抢劫：是否在过去12个月及更早发生过抢劫或未遂抢劫、过去12个月内抢劫的发生频率、事件是否发生在德国境内、德国境内事件的发生频率、所属联邦州、记录的开放提及城市/城镇信息、事件发生地点（自有住宅、公共场所、建筑物内）、建筑物类型（如银行分支机构）、事件是否发生在工作期间、是否有财物被盗、被盗物品的盗窃保险情况、是否已通知警方、事件是否被媒体报道、是否希望事件被媒体报道、对媒体报道的满意程度（较为满意/较为不满）、媒体报道渠道（报纸含网络版、（网络）电视、（网络）广播或其他渠道）、报道仅针对事件还是同时涉及受访者本人、对报道自身的公平性评价；仇恨犯罪：受害者选择的原因（受害者的宗教、性取向、性别、性别认同、残疾、肤色、出身、年龄、政治世界观、社会地位或其他公开说明的原因）。仅针对末次（或唯一）受害事件的附加问题：受访者、伴侣、家庭成员、朋友或其他人员是否已就该事件通知警方，或警方已抵达现场；警方的通知方式；是否已立案；报案人信息；在派出所签署的文件；未向警方报案的原因（如案件不严重、已由家庭自行解决、已向其他机构报案、未投保、报案无济于事、惧怕警方、担心报复）；报案的原因（如从犯罪者或保险公司获得赔偿、犯罪应始终报案、惩处犯罪者、案件严重以防止再次发生、丢失官方文件）；对警方处理该事件的满意度；对警方处置不满的原因（如处置过少、行动过慢、态度冷漠、未及时告知进展等）；被盗物品的重置价值（欧元）、末次抢劫的涉案作案人数、受访者是否看到作案者或多名作案者、作案者的熟悉程度（至少一名作案者为亲属、至少一名作案者为熟人或朋友、至少一名作案者仅见过面、所有作案者均为陌生人）、作案者是否携带武器或至少一名作案者携带武器、武器类型（枪支、刀具、其他锐器、钝器、其他武器或物品）、是否使用武器（含仅威胁）、受访者在末次抢劫中是否受伤、受伤后的医疗救治情况、本次事件对受访者的严重程度。
- 袭击：是否在过去12个月及更早发生过袭击、过去12个月内袭击的发生频率、事件是否发生在德国境内、德国境内事件的发生频率、所属联邦州、记录的开放提及城市/城镇信息、事件发生地点、涉案作案人数、袭击类型（被殴打、扼颈、烧伤、被喷洒刺激性气体、被刀具或类似器械刺伤、被枪支或其他武器伤害等）、作案者或至少一名作案者携带武器、是否已通知警方、事件是否被媒体报道、是否希望事件被媒体报道、对媒体报道的满意程度（较为满意/较为不满）、媒体报道渠道（报纸含网络版、（网络）电视、（网络）广播或其他渠道）、报道仅针对事件还是同时涉及受访者本人、对报道自身的公平性评价；仇恨犯罪：受害者选择的原因（受害者的宗教、性取向、性别、性别认同、残疾、肤色、出身、年龄、政治世界观、社会地位或其他公开说明的原因）。仅针对末次（或唯一）受害事件的附加问题：受访者、伴侣、家庭成员、朋友或其他人员是否已就该事件通知警方，或警方已抵达现场；警方的通知方式；是否已立案；报案人信息；与警方签署的文件；未向警方报案的原因（如案件不严重、已由家庭自行解决、已向其他机构报案、投保、报案无济于事、惧怕警方、担心报复）；报案的原因（如从犯罪者或保险公司获得赔偿、犯罪应始终报案、惩处犯罪者、案件严重以防止再次发生、丢失官方文件）；对警方处理该事件的满意度；对警方处置不满的原因（如处置过少、行动过慢、态度冷漠、未及时告知进展等）；受访者是否看到作案者或多名作案者、作案者的熟悉程度（至少一名作案者为配偶或前配偶、伴侣、亲属、至少一名作案者为熟人或朋友、至少一名作案者仅见过面、所有作案者均为陌生人）、受访者在末次袭击中是否受伤、受伤后的医疗救治情况、本次事件对受访者的严重程度。

人口统计学变量：性别、最高学历（已编码）、教育程度（依据ISCED-1997国际教育标准分类法）、就业状态、婚姻状况、稳定伴侣情况、与伴侣同住情况、家庭中15岁及以下、16-17岁儿童的数量、过去5年内家庭人口数量的变化、公民身份、其他公民身份、双重公民身份、非德国公民身份、出生国家、移民年份、父母的出生国家、父母的移民年份、所有祖父母均出生于西德（FRG）、东德（GDR）或前德国东部领土、至少一位祖父母出生于土耳其或前苏联、移民背景、第一/二代移民背景、本人的移民经历、父母的移民经历、宗教信仰、家庭净收入、联邦州；电信媒体设备与可及性：家庭固定电话号码数量、通讯可及性（昨日、前日、3日前）、通过其他电话（移动或固定电话）的可及性、其他电话的可及性（昨日、前日、3日前）、其他16岁及以上家庭成员的活跃手机号码数量。

额外编码变量包括：参与情况：调查波次（survey wave）、参与的模块（模块1波次1：犯罪恐惧（仅2012年收集）、模块1波次1：媒体使用（仅2012年收集）、模块1：社会心理学视角与态度、模块2：涉罪态度、模块3：社区失序/不文明行为、模块4：互联网使用安全感、模块5：针对性犯罪恐惧）、司法问题参与情况（2012年波次1未包含）、2012年情景实验套件、2017年情景实验套件。样本标识变量：样本类型（基础样本、增补样本、专有抽样样本（onomastic sample））、增补案例的州标识变量、专有抽样样本标识、（潜在）专有抽样样本标识变量（仅2012年）、固定或移动电话抽样样本、主研究或转换研究。权重变量：抽样概率（仅波次1，如基础样本/增补样本的案例数量标准化后的个人/家庭权重、专有抽样样本的个人/家庭权重）、设计权重、外推因子、复杂抽样设计加权的样本分层、辅助变量。元数据（paradata）：邮政编码（或其部分信息）的可用/缺失情况、访谈语言（专有抽样样本）、基线与补充接触的最终语言、汇总后的访谈语言、访谈标识符、允许开始访谈的标识、访谈日期（日、月、年）、访谈开始时间（时、分）、总访谈时长（秒）、访谈员性别、访谈员年龄组别、访谈员的任职年限、每位访谈员完成的有效访谈数量。衍生变量：受害经历、患病率（12个月患病率、5年患病率）及报案率。