Non-Existence of Point Gravity

This white paper interrogates one of the most foundational yet least examined assumptions in physics: the idea that gravity originates from point sources. While widely accepted across classical and relativistic models, the concept of point-based gravity introduces major unresolved issues. These include singularities with infinite density, paradoxes surrounding black hole interiors, breakdowns in quantum-gravitational integration, and persistent failure in high-energy confinement strategies such as controlled fusion.

Despite its deep entrenchment in theoretical frameworks, no empirical evidence supports the existence of true point-like mass in nature. All observed systems—from particles to galaxies—exhibit surface-defined boundaries, rotational structure, and extended field interactions. The continued reliance on point gravity undercuts progress toward unified physical theories and hampers the development of field-controlling technologies.

This paper identifies the logical inconsistencies and physical consequences of treating gravity as a point-derived force and frames the need for a deeper geometric and boundary-based understanding of gravitational behavior. It is intended for physicists, systems theorists, and cross-disciplinary researchers engaged in foundational questions about the structure of matter, energy, and spacetime.

本白皮书批判性审视了物理学中最基础却最少被探究的核心假设之一：引力起源于点源（point sources）的观点。尽管该观点在经典力学与相对论模型中被广泛接受，但基于点源的引力概念却引发了诸多未解决的重大问题：包括无限密度的奇点、黑洞内部相关的悖论、量子引力统一框架的失效，以及可控核聚变这类高能量约束策略长期未能取得突破。尽管该假设在理论框架中根深蒂固，但尚无实证证据表明自然界中存在真正的类点质量（point-like mass）。从微观粒子到宏观星系的所有观测系统，均具备由表面界定的边界、旋转结构与延展场相互作用。继续依赖点源引力模型，不仅会阻碍统一物理理论的发展进程，还会制约场控技术的研发。本白皮书指出了将引力视为点源衍生力所存在的逻辑矛盾与物理后果，并阐明了我们需要对引力行为建立更深入的几何视角与基于边界的认知。本白皮书面向物理学家、系统理论家，以及从事物质、能量与时空结构基础问题研究的跨学科研究人员。