five

Data from: Are all forms of defense lost on islands? Persistence of an indirect defensive trait in six island colonists from New Zealand

收藏
Mendeley Data2024-04-13 更新2024-06-27 收录
下载链接:
https://datadryad.org/stash/dataset/doi:10.5061/dryad.rbnzs7hg3
下载链接
链接失效反馈
资源简介:
(a) Data collection Data collection was conducted between June 2018 and April 2019. The six study taxa (Coprosma repens [Rubiaceae], C. rhamnoides, C. robusta, C. lucida, Elaeocarpus dentatus [Elaeocapraceae] and Vitex lucens [Lamiaceae]) were chosen as they are the most widely distributed across New Zealand’s north-eastern islands. All taxa produce pit domatia, except E. dentatus which produces tent domatia. Mainland field sampling was conducted in the Kaimai-Mamaku Forest Park in Tauranga (37°41ʹS, 175°45ʹE). This site was chosen because the Kaimai Ranges span a large latitudinal extent of the north-eastern corner of New Zealand, and therefore represent the probable source pool for many island populations. Island field sampling was conducted on seven islands: Cuvier, Great Mercury, Red Mercury, Otata, Ruamahuaiti, Ruamahuanui, and Waiheke. Individuals were chosen haphazardly while walking through easily accessible forest sections. Only fully expanded, mature leaves were measured (1-3 leaves per individual from at least 30 individuals per site per species). Leaf length was measured as the longest linear distance from the most proximal to the most distal point of the leaf lamina using a digital calliper. Leaf width was measured as the widest distance across the leaf lamina perpendicular to the leaf length measurement. Leaf area was calculated as the product of leaf length and leaf width. Although more accurate methods of estimating leaf area exist [e.g., leaf scanners, image recognition software, or using ad hoc leaf shape correction factors 43], leaf x width calculations sufficed for the purpose of this analysis as it is not concerned with among species differences in leaf size per se. Couched in other terms, any errors associated with leaf area estimates are consistent between island-mainland comparisons. In a prior study incorporating the same species. I trialled ad hoc correction factors and found they provided little utility. Further, a leaf scanner could not be used as most of the islands included in this study are protected by the Department of Conservation, which does not allow destructive sampling protocols. Domatia were counted systematically in a basipetal direction with the aid of a USB microscope (Toolcraft DigiMicro 2.0 Scale). It should be noted that while this study quantifies defense investment by domatia count, experimental work with Grape cultivars has demonstrated that mite abundance on the phylloplane can scale with domatia size. To expand upon data gathered in the field, pressed herbarium specimens from a further 53 islands and 58 mainland sites from the Auckland War Memorial Museum Herbarium (AK) were measured. The Herbarium houses an extensive collection of high-quality, preserved specimens of both indigenous and exotic plants spanning the full geographic extent of the New Zealand landmass – including its offshore islands. To standardize sampling across specimens, 3 leaves per specimen were measured using the same methodology outlined above. Leaves were chosen haphazardly, and care was taken to not damage specimens (i.e., gloves and minimal calliper–specimen contact). 1,129 observations from 60 islands and 59 mainland sites comprised the final dataset. (b) Data analysis To test for mainland-island differences in domatia production, while simultaneously accounting for leaf size and exploring differences in domatia–leaf size scaling, I performed a linear mixed effects models of number of domatia production (total count per leaf) against leaf area (cm2), insularity (island, mainland), and their interaction. Both domatia count and leaf area were logarithm transformed to conform to linearity. One was added to counts of domatia before transformation to avoid biologically nonsensical values (i.e., negative infinity). Species was included as a random effect permitting both intercept and slope to vary among species. Analysis and data visualization were conducted in R version 4.2.2 (R Core Team 2022) using the ‘lme4’ and ‘tidyverse’ packages.
创建时间:
2023-06-28
用户留言
有没有相关的论文或文献参考?
这个数据集是基于什么背景创建的?
数据集的作者是谁?
能帮我联系到这个数据集的作者吗?
这个数据集如何下载?
点击留言
数据主题
具身智能
数据集  4099个
机构  8个
大模型
数据集  439个
机构  10个
无人机
数据集  37个
机构  6个
指令微调
数据集  36个
机构  6个
蛋白质结构
数据集  50个
机构  8个
空间智能
数据集  21个
机构  5个
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
热门数据集

中国劳动力动态调查

“中国劳动力动态调查” (China Labor-force Dynamics Survey,简称 CLDS)是“985”三期“中山大学社会科学特色数据库建设”专项内容,CLDS的目的是通过对中国城乡以村/居为追踪范围的家庭、劳动力个体开展每两年一次的动态追踪调查,系统地监测村/居社区的社会结构和家庭、劳动力个体的变化与相互影响,建立劳动力、家庭和社区三个层次上的追踪数据库,从而为进行实证导向的高质量的理论研究和政策研究提供基础数据。

中国学术调查数据资料库 收录

OpenSonarDatasets

OpenSonarDatasets是一个致力于整合开放源代码声纳数据集的仓库,旨在为水下研究和开发提供便利。该仓库鼓励研究人员扩展当前的数据集集合,以增加开放源代码声纳数据集的可见性,并提供一个更容易查找和比较数据集的方式。

github 收录

中国交通事故深度调查(CIDAS)数据集

交通事故深度调查数据通过采用科学系统方法现场调查中国道路上实际发生交通事故相关的道路环境、道路交通行为、车辆损坏、人员损伤信息,以探究碰撞事故中车损和人伤机理。目前已积累深度调查事故10000余例,单个案例信息包含人、车 、路和环境多维信息组成的3000多个字段。该数据集可作为深入分析中国道路交通事故工况特征,探索事故预防和损伤防护措施的关键数据源,为制定汽车安全法规和标准、完善汽车测评试验规程、

北方大数据交易中心 收录

FlowBench

FlowBench是由爱荷华州立大学创建的一个大规模流体模拟数据集,包含超过10,000个样本,旨在评估神经PDE求解器在复杂几何形状上的性能。数据集涵盖了多种复杂几何形状(参数化和非参数化)和流体条件(雷诺数和格拉晓夫数),捕捉了从稳态到瞬态的各种流体现象。每个样本都包含速度、压力和温度场的数据,以及升力、阻力和努塞尔数等工程特征。FlowBench的创建过程包括使用高保真模拟器进行直接数值模拟,确保数据的准确性和可靠性。该数据集主要应用于工程领域,如航空航天、汽车设计和生物流体学,旨在解决复杂几何形状上的流体动力学问题。

arXiv 收录

THCHS-30

“THCHS30是由清华大学语音与语言技术中心(CSLT)发布的开放式汉语语音数据库。原始录音是2002年在清华大学国家重点实验室的朱晓燕教授的指导下,由王东完成的。清华大学计算机科学系智能与系统,原名“TCMSD”,意思是“清华连续普通话语音数据库”,时隔13年出版,由王东博士发起,并得到了教授的支持。朱小燕。我们希望为语音识别领域的新研究人员提供一个玩具数据库。因此,该数据库对学术用户完全免费。整个软件包包含建立中文语音识别所需的全套语音和语言资源系统。”

OpenDataLab 收录