MOESM1 of High altitude population of Arabidopsis thaliana is more plastic and adaptive under common garden than controlled condition

Additional file 1: Table S1. Post-hoc (Bonferroni) test (P values) for pair wise comparison of traits between the three populations of Arabidopsis thaliana in common garden (CG) and controlled condition (GH). Significant figures are in bold. Table S2. Analysis of significance of effect of population and growth environment (CG vs. GH) on vegetative, flowering and reproductive traits for three populations of Arabidopsis thaliana using mixed model ANOVA. Table S3. Correlation between morphological traits measured within the two conditions. The upper triangle shows Pearson correlation (r) between traits within the common garden (CG) and lower triangle for within the controlled condition (GH). Significant values are shown in bold (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001). Table S4. Analysis of variation for amount of phenotypic plasticity. The significance of variation in phenotypic plasticity among the three populations was tested using ANOVA. All traits were significant at P value < 0.05. Table S5. Post-hoc (Bonferroni) test (P values) for pair wise comparison of plasticity for all the traits between the three populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. Table S6. Phenotypic plasticity of the three populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. The confidence interval of plasticity was calculated using 1000 iterations. Table S7. Coefficients for direct, indirect and bootstrap estimated total effect for the latent variables used for path analysis in the two condition. Total effect is sum of direct and indirect effect. Numbers in brackets represent 95% confidence interval for total effect. Table S8. Loading and weight of all the traits on their latent variable (blocks) estimated using partial least square path analysis. 95% confidence intervals estimated using 1000 bootstrap are shown in brackets. Table S9. Average monthly weather conditions of Common garden site at Lucknow, India during the growth period. Altitude: 113 m above mean sea level; Geographical coordinates: 260 55′ N, 800 59′ E. Table S10. Ls mean of phenotypic traits for all accessions with 95% confidence interval. Table S11. Raw data of all the phenotypic traits measured for all accessions under the two growth conditions.附加文件1：表S1。针对拟南芥（Arabidopsis thaliana）三个种群在共栽环境（common garden, CG）与可控培养环境（controlled condition, GH）下的性状开展两两比较的事后邦弗朗尼（Bonferroni）校正检验（P值结果），有效数值以加粗字体标注。表S2：采用混合模型方差分析（ANOVA），探究拟南芥三个种群的种群属性与生长环境（CG vs. GH）对其营养生长、开花及生殖相关性状的影响显著性。表S3：两种生长环境下测得的形态性状间的相关性分析。其中上三角区域为共栽环境（CG）内各性状间的皮尔逊相关系数（r），下三角区域为可控环境（GH）内各性状间的皮尔逊相关系数；显著性相关结果以加粗字体标注（*P < 0.05；**P < 0.01；***P < 0.001）。表S4：表型可塑性量的变异分析。采用方差分析（ANOVA）检验三个拟南芥种群间表型可塑性的变异显著性，所有性状的P值均小于0.05。表S5：拟南芥三个种群间所有性状的可塑性两两比较的事后邦弗朗尼校正检验（P值结果）。表S6：拟南芥三个种群的表型可塑性。通过1000次迭代计算得到可塑性的置信区间。表S7：两种环境下用于路径分析的潜变量的直接效应、间接效应及Bootstrap估计总效应系数。总效应为直接效应与间接效应之和，括号内数值为总效应的95%置信区间。表S8：通过偏最小二乘路径分析（partial least square path analysis）估算得到的所有性状在其对应潜变量（模块）上的载荷与权重，括号内为通过1000次Bootstrap法估算得到的95%置信区间。表S9：印度勒克瑙共栽实验场地在作物生长季的月均气象条件。场地海拔为平均海平面以上113米，地理坐标为北纬26°55′、东经80°59′。表S10：所有拟南芥种质的表型性状最小二乘均值（Ls mean）及其95%置信区间。表S11：两种生长环境下为所有种质测得的全部表型性状原始数据。