The association between non-compliance and the experience of regret after choosing a CRC screening option.

OR: Odds Ratio; CRC: Colorectal CancerThe study was conducted from 2008–2012 in Hong Kong.*The regret scale is a four-item questionnaire with a score range from1 (no regret) to 5 (extreme regret). The binary logistic regression model adjusted for participants’ age; gender; educational level; perception of the necessity for people aged >50 years to undergo CRC screening; prior CRC screening examination; their need for more information on CRC screening; knowledge scores on CRC; whether the participants changed their mind on the preferred screening option before and after the health talks; the degree of pressure felt whilst making the decision; and their scores on satisfaction of the screening programmeThe association between non-compliance and the experience of regret after choosing a CRC screening option.OR：优势比（Odds Ratio）；CRC：结直肠癌（Colorectal Cancer）。本研究于2008年至2012年在香港开展。后悔量表为四条目问卷，得分区间为1分（无后悔）至5分（极度后悔）。本研究采用二元逻辑回归（binary logistic regression）模型，对以下混杂变量进行校正：研究对象的年龄、性别、受教育水平、对50岁以上人群需行结直肠癌筛查必要性的认知、既往结直肠癌筛查史、对结直肠癌筛查相关信息的额外需求、结直肠癌知识得分、参与者在健康讲座前后对首选筛查方案的意向是否发生改变、决策过程中所感受到的压力程度，以及对该筛查项目的满意度评分。本研究旨在探讨结直肠癌筛查方案选择后，筛查不依从行为与后悔体验之间的关联。