Un caso di ius controversum in tema di operis novi nuntiatio

That essay analyses two texts (D. 39.1.23, Iav. 7 ep. and D. 4.7.3.3., Gai. 4 ad ed. prov.) which appear to sharply contrast each other. Both fragments deal with an operis novi nuntiatio notified to a land seller and a building constructed by the land buyer. The contrast concerns the extension of the ban to the purchaser. The paper refuses 1) the attempt to level out the opinions of Iavolenus and Gaius, 2) the thesis that their decisions concerned different cases, 3) the thesis that justifies their contrast in the light of the differences between Italic and provincial jurisdictions. The author believes that question was a case of ius controversum: the words 'quasi' and 'dicitur' could suggest that Gaius was referring an opinion he did not share.

本文针对两篇看似截然对立的文献片段——《学说汇纂》（Digesta）D.39.1.23（即雅沃伦努斯（Iavolenus）《书信集》第7封）与《学说汇纂》D.4.7.3.3（即盖尤斯（Gaius）《行省告示评注》第4卷）展开剖析。两篇片段均围绕新建建筑申报（operis novi nuntiatio）及土地受让方所修建的建筑展开讨论，二者的对立焦点在于禁令是否扩张适用于土地受让方。本文驳斥了三种观点：其一，试图调和雅沃伦努斯与盖尤斯的主张；其二，认为二者的裁判所针对的并非同一案件；其三，以意大利与行省的司法管辖权差异为由，为二者的对立观点辩护。作者认为，该争议属于有争议的法律问题（ius controversum）：文中出现的"quasi"与"dicitur"二词，可表明盖尤斯所援引的并非其本人认同的主张。