Comparison to other methods.
收藏Figshare2015-12-02 更新2026-04-29 收录
下载链接：
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Comparison_to_other_methods_/182646
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务：
资源简介：
Most of tFIRE prediction is better than others. Except the use of AlignACE, BioProspector for GAL4 as well as the use of MEME for HAP1 outperform our structure-based approach.aNS: Number of sites collected from TRANSFAC and SCPD.bNO: Number of ORFs these binding sites taking place.cSE: Sensitivity [TP/(TP+FN)]. SP: Specificity [TP/(TP+FP)]. AUC: Area Under Receiver operating characteristic Curve.dAlignACE [48] v4.0 result using parameter as: number of columns = LTFBS.eBioProspector [49] result as: motif width = LTFBS; top motifs to report = NSites.fMEME [47] v4.3.0 result as: maximum motif width = LTFBS; maximum sites = NSites; maximum motif number = NSites.gAverage value over LEU3, GAL4, MCM1, MATALPHA2, TBP, PUT3, GCN4, HAP1, RAP1.
创建时间：
2015-12-02
