two-stage DEA data of the NHRD system

A two-stage data envelopment analysis model to evaluate the efficiency of the talent cultivation and talent utilization of NHRD systems in various countries from the perspective of HRD. The research samples mainly included OECD members, but also included BRIC countries such as China, Brazil, and Russia. After eliminating the countries with incomplete data, there were finally 60 countries. Variable data sources included the Government Finance Statistics Yearbook (GFSY) 2013 (IMF, 2014), the OECD Main Science and Technology Indicators (2014) (OECD, 2014), the World Talent Report (WTR), and the World Competitiveness Yearbook (WCY), both issued by the Institute for Management Development IMD (2014–2017) between 2014 and 2017, the WIPO Statistics Database (2016), the Conference Board Total Economy Database (2017), and World Bank Open Data (2016). Considering that there was a delay, there was a time gap of at least one year between the inputs and outputs. The evaluation period was from 2013 to 2017, for a total of five years.本研究采用两阶段数据包络分析（two-stage data envelopment analysis）模型，从人力资源开发（Human Resource Development, HRD）视角，评估多国国家人力资源开发（National Human Resource Development, NHRD）系统的人才培养与人才利用效率。本研究的样本主体为经济合作与发展组织（Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD）成员国，同时涵盖中国、巴西、俄罗斯等金砖国家（BRIC）。在剔除数据不全的国家后，最终纳入分析的国家共60个。变量数据来源包括：2013年《政府财政统计年鉴》（Government Finance Statistics Yearbook, GFSY）（国际货币基金组织（International Monetary Fund, IMF），2014）；经济合作与发展组织《主要科学与技术指标（2014）》（OECD, 2014）；由国际管理发展学院（Institute for Management Development, IMD）于2014至2017年发布的《世界人才报告》（World Talent Report, WTR）与《世界竞争力年鉴》（World Competitiveness Yearbook, WCY）；世界知识产权组织（World Intellectual Property Organization, WIPO）统计数据库（2016）；世界大型企业联合会总经济数据库（2017）；以及世界银行开放数据（2016）。考虑到数据存在时滞，投入与产出指标间的时间间隔至少为1年。本次评估的时间跨度为2013年至2017年，共计5年。