QGMF: Structural Resolution to Dark Matter and Propulsion

This paper I present, is some will say too radical, or not possible. I still say, "says who" ? This paper does postulate what we can observe as what the standard model calls Dark Matter/ Dark Energy. The postulate is this: what most call dark matter/energy. The Quantum Gravity Model Framework Cosmological model; proposed that this is gravatational shear and it's adjacent (recoil). Think this way if you might: Gravity: the decay of motion applie to mass. Stabilized but the angular momentum trajectory of the host center of mass. Now think of this too.. traveling "as" mass in space without the need for any ambiguous "time-dilation"; the reason this postulate is presented is simply this: "You cannot take the sun nor the earth physically with any proposed interstellar mission. This is outlined in the paper as well, as is my other works is this field of study.本文所呈现的研究内容，或会被部分人认为过于激进，抑或认为其不切实际。对此我仍将反问："此言何据？" 本文提出的假设，针对的正是我们观测到的、被标准模型（Standard Model）定义为暗物质/暗能量（Dark Matter/Dark Energy）的物理现象。 该假设的核心如下：学界普遍所称的暗物质/暗能量，在量子引力模型框架宇宙学模型（Quantum Gravity Model Framework Cosmological model）中，被认为是引力剪切（gravitational shear）及其伴随的反冲效应。 不妨作如下理解：引力是施加于质量的运动衰减效应，其稳定性由宿主质心的角动量轨迹维持。 不妨再作此设想：以质量形态在空间中行进，却无需借助任何引发歧义的"时间膨胀（time dilation）"。提出该假设的初衷十分直白："任何星际任务都无法实际携带太阳或地球。" 这一点在本文中已有阐述，正如我在本研究领域的其他著作中所呈现的内容一致。