Datasets - From research to application: evaluation of literaturebased and newly identified GWAS and GP-derived loci for anthracnose resistance in white lupin, across validation panels and environments

Supplementary Table S1: Samples included in the diversity panel, indicating the status of the accession, estimated marginal means phenotypic values, standard error and predicted phenotypic values as well as all genotyping available for the panel. Supplementary Table S2: Samples included in the multi-parental panel, sAUDPC values from the field phenotyping, and predicted phenotypic values, letter coding of the pedigree, indicator of the generation, as well as all genotyping available for the panel. Supplementary Table S3: Samples included in the multi-parental panel, estimated marginal means of phenotypic values from the climate chamber phenotyping, standard error and predicted phenotypic values as well as all genotyping available for the panel. Supplementary Table S4: Samples included in the biparental panel, phenotypic values from a single late-season field phenotyping, and predicted phenotypic values, as well as all genotyping available for the panel. Supplementary Table S5: Marker information of the panel of markers used for individual assessment indicating the chromosome and location of the SNP used for marker design, indicating reference and alternative allele at each loci, which primer type it is, the respective primer sequence, as well as marking which marker was transformed from a previous publication or was determined de novo for the study. In the latter case, also highlighting which model and genotyping was used for the marker definition and the explained variance. Supplementary Table S6: Marker information of the panel of markers used for genomic prediction indicating the chromosome and location of the SNP used for marker design, indicating reference and alternative allele at each locus, marker effect, which primer type it is, the respective primer sequence, as well as marking which marker was transformed from a previous publication or was determined de novo for the study. In the latter case, also highlighting which model and genotyping was used for the marker definition. Supplementary Table S7: Significance, explained variance, effect size and false discovery rate of each locus from the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), including the number homo- and heterozygotes at each locus, and the respective anthracnose score means at each locus. "NA" refers to loci which were monomorphic in a given validation panel补充表S1：纳入多样性群体的样本，列明了种质材料（accession）的状态、估算边际均值表型值、标准误与预测表型值，以及该群体可用的全部基因型分型数据。 补充表S2：纳入多亲群体的样本、田间表型鉴定得到的标准化病害曲线下面积（sAUDPC）值、预测表型值、系谱字母编码、世代标识，以及该群体可用的全部基因型分型数据。 补充表S3：纳入多亲群体的样本、气候室表型鉴定得到的表型值估算边际均值、标准误与预测表型值，以及该群体可用的全部基因型分型数据。 补充表S4：纳入双亲亲本群体的样本、单次晚季田间表型鉴定得到的表型值与预测表型值，以及该群体可用的全部基因型分型数据。 补充表S5：用于单株评估的标记面板的标记信息，列明了用于标记设计的单核苷酸多态性（Single Nucleotide Polymorphism, SNP）所在染色体与位置、每个位点的参考等位基因与变异等位基因、引物类型、对应引物序列，同时标注了哪些标记是从已发表研究中转化而来，或是为本研究从头开发的。若为后者，还需说明用于标记定义的模型与基因型分型方法，以及该标记的解释方差。 补充表S6：用于基因组预测的标记面板的标记信息，列明了用于标记设计的SNP所在染色体与位置、每个位点的参考等位基因与变异等位基因、标记效应、引物类型、对应引物序列，同时标注了哪些标记是从已发表研究中转化而来，或是为本研究从头开发的。若为后者，还需说明用于标记定义的模型与基因型分型方法。 补充表S7：方差分析（Analysis of Variance, ANOVA）得到的各位点的显著性水平、解释方差、效应量与错误发现率，包含每个位点的纯合子与杂合子数量，以及每个位点对应的炭疽病评分均值。"NA"指在指定验证群体中呈单态性的位点。