Data from: A new subfamily classification of the Leguminosae based on a taxonomically comprehensive phylogeny

Voucher information for LPWG matK sequencesSupplemental Data: Table S1. Voucher information and GenBank numbers for all accessions included in the phylogenetic analyses of matK gene sequences. Specimens identified with an asterisk (*) are included in the phylogenetic analyses presented in Fig. 1 and in Supplemental Data Fig. S1. The remaining sequences are not included in the final analyses but are listed here to indicate that they were validated by LPWG. A total of 5,560 legume sequences were verified. Phylogenetic analyses of all sequences listed allowed us to ascertain that the sequences are of good quality, properly identified taxonomically, and that they are not contaminants.TableS1_LPWG_matK2016_vouchers.xlsRAxML Bootstrap Consensus Phylogenetic TreeSupplemental Data: Figure S1. Phylogeny of Leguminosae based on a RAxML analysis of 3,844 matK sequences representing 3,696 of the c. 19,500 species and 698 of the 765 genera of the family, including 100 outgroup taxa (uncoloured) spanning core Eudicots. Branch lengths are proportional to numbers of matK substitutions. All subfamilies are supported with 100% bootstrap. The phylogenetic tree can be visualised (e.g., with FigTree (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/) or Dendroscope (http://dendroscope.org/; Huson & Scornavacca, 2012), and downloaded from Supplemental Data: Data file C.Fig.Supp.RAXML.pdfPoster illustrating the new LPWG Legume ClassificationSupplemental Data: Figure S2. Schematic diagram illustrating the six new subfamilies of Leguminosae and their floral diversity.Poster_LPWG_LD_final_v2.pdfHigh Resolution Poster illustrating the new LPWG Legume ClassificationSupplemental Data: Figure S3. Schematic diagram illustrating the six new subfamilies of Leguminosae and their floral diversity.Poster_LPWG_HD_final_v2.pdfAligned matK matrixSupplemental Data: Data File A. The aligned matK DNA sequence matrix of 3,744 legume sequences and 100 outgroup taxa spanning core Eudicots. Nexus format.A_LPWG_matK2016_aligned_matrix.nexBayesian Majority Rule Phylobayes Consensus TreeSupplemental Data: Data File B. Bayesian phylogenetic consensus tree (newick format) resulting from a PhyloBayes analysis of matK DNA sequences for 3,744 legume sequences and 100 outgroup taxa.B_LPWG_matK2016_Bayesian_majority-rule_consensus_tree_Phylobayes.treBootstrap Majority-rule RAxML Consensus TreeSupplemental Data: Data File C. Bootstrap consensus tree, based on 1000 replicates (newick format) resulting from the RAxML analysis of matK DNA sequences for 3,744 legume sequences and 100 outgroup taxa.C_LPWG_matK2016_bootstrap_majority-rule_consensus_tree_RAxML.treBest-scoring Maximum Likelihood RAxML TreeSupplemental Data: Data File D. Best-scoring Maximum Likelihood tree (newick format) resulting from the RAxML phylogenetic analysis of matK DNA sequences for 3,744 legume sequences and 100 outgroup taxa.D_LPWG_matK2016_best-scoring_maximum_likelihood_tree_RAxML.treSample of 1000 Phylobayes Posterior TreesSupplemental Data: Data File E. Sample of 1000 Bayesian posterior trees (newick format) resulting from a PhyloBayes analysis of matK DNA sequences for 3,744 legume sequences and 100 outgroup taxa. This sample of posterior trees can be used to account for phylogenetic uncertainty in comparative analyses.E_LPWG_matK2016_1000_posterior_trees_Phylobayes.treSample of 1000 RAxML Bootstrap TreesSupplemental Data: Data File F. Sample of 1000 bootstrapped trees (newick format) resulting from a RAxML analysis of matK DNA sequences for 3,744 legume sequences and 100 outgroup taxa. This sample of posterior trees can be used to account for phylogenetic uncertainty in comparative analyses.F_LPWG_matK2016_1000_bootstrap_trees_RAxML.tre

LPWG matK序列凭证标本信息
补充数据：表S1。本表格收录了本研究matK基因序列系统发育分析中纳入的全部受试样本的凭证标本信息及GenBank编号。带星号（*）标注的标本同时纳入图1及补充数据图S1的系统发育分析。其余序列未纳入最终分析，但在此列出以表明其已通过LPWG的验证。本研究共验证了5560条豆科序列。对所有所列序列开展的系统发育分析证实，这些序列质量优良、分类鉴定准确且无外源污染。
配套数据文件：TableS1_LPWG_matK2016_vouchers.xls

RAxML自举一致性系统发育树
补充数据：图S1。本图为基于3844条matK序列的RAxML分析构建的豆科植物系统发育树，这些序列涵盖该科约19500个物种中的3696个、765个属中的698个属，同时纳入了覆盖核心真双子叶植物的100个外类群（无着色标注）。分支长度与matK基因替换数目呈正比。所有亚科均获得100%自举支持。该系统发育树可通过FigTree（http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/）或Dendroscope（http://dendroscope.org/; Huson & Scornavacca, 2012）等工具进行可视化，并可从补充数据文件C下载。
配套数据文件：Fig.Supp.RAXML.pdf

LPWG豆科新分类群宣传海报
补充数据：图S2。该示意图展示了豆科植物六个新亚科及其花部多样性特征。
配套数据文件：Poster_LPWG_LD_final_v2.pdf

LPWG豆科新分类群高清宣传海报
补充数据：图S3。该示意图展示了豆科植物六个新亚科及其花部多样性特征。
配套数据文件：Poster_LPWG_HD_final_v2.pdf

比对后的matK序列矩阵
补充数据：数据文件A。本文件为包含3744条豆科序列及100个覆盖核心真双子叶植物的外类群序列的比对后matK DNA序列矩阵，格式为Nexus。
配套数据文件：A_LPWG_matK2016_aligned_matrix.nex

贝叶斯多数一致Phylobayes系统发育树
补充数据：数据文件B。本文件为基于3744条豆科序列及100个外类群的matK DNA序列开展Phylobayes分析得到的贝叶斯系统发育一致性树（newick格式）。
配套数据文件：B_LPWG_matK2016_Bayesian_majority-rule_consensus_tree_Phylobayes.tre

自举多数一致RAxML系统发育树
补充数据：数据文件C。本文件为基于1000次重复抽样的自举一致性树（newick格式），由3744条豆科序列及100个外类群的matK DNA序列开展RAxML分析得到。
配套数据文件：C_LPWG_matK2016_bootstrap_majority-rule_consensus_tree_RAxML.tre

最优得分最大似然RAxML系统发育树
补充数据：数据文件D。本文件为基于3744条豆科序列及100个外类群的matK DNA序列开展RAxML系统发育分析得到的最优得分最大似然树（newick格式）。
配套数据文件：D_LPWG_matK2016_best-scoring_maximum_likelihood_tree_RAxML.tre

1000棵Phylobayes后验树样本
补充数据：数据文件E。本文件为基于3744条豆科序列及100个外类群的matK DNA序列开展Phylobayes分析得到的1000棵贝叶斯后验树样本（newick格式）。该后验树样本可用于校正比较分析中的系统发育不确定性。
配套数据文件：E_LPWG_matK2016_1000_posterior_trees_Phylobayes.tre

1000棵RAxML自举树样本
补充数据：数据文件F。本文件为基于3744条豆科序列及100个外类群的matK DNA序列开展RAxML分析得到的1000棵自举树样本（newick格式）。该自举树样本可用于校正比较分析中的系统发育不确定性。
配套数据文件：F_LPWG_matK2016_1000_bootstrap_trees_RAxML.tre