five

Phase I Randomized Clinical Trial of VRC DNA and rAd5 HIV-1 Vaccine Delivery by Intramuscular (IM), Subcutaneous (SC) and Intradermal (ID) Administration (VRC 011)

收藏
Figshare2016-01-18 更新2026-04-29 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Phase_I_Randomized_Clinical_Trial_of_VRC_DNA_and_rAd5_HIV_1_Vaccine_Delivery_by_Intramuscular_IM_Subcutaneous_SC_and_Intradermal_ID_Administration_VRC_011_/959500
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
BackgroundPhase 1 evaluation of the VRC HIV DNA and rAd5 vaccines delivered intramuscularly (IM) supported proceeding to a Phase 2 b efficacy study. Here we report comparison of the IM, subcutaneous (SC) and intradermal (ID) routes of administration.MethodsSixty subjects were randomized to 6 schedules to evaluate the IM, SC or ID route for prime injections. Three schedules included DNA primes (Wks 0,4,8) and 3 schedules included rAd5 prime (Wk0); all included rAd5 IM boost (Wk24). DNA vaccine dosage was 4 mg IM or SC, but 0.4 mg ID, while all rAd5 vaccinations were 1010 PU. All injections were administered by needle and syringe.ResultsOverall, 27/30 subjects completed 3 DNA primes; 30/30 subjects completed rAd5 primes. Mild local pruritus (itchiness), superficial skin lesions and injection site nodules were associated with ID and SC, but not IM injections. All routes induced T-cell and antibody immune responses after rAd5 boosting. Overall, >95% had Env antibody and >80% had Env T-cell responses.ConclusionsThe pattern of local reactogenicity following ID and SC injections differed from IM injections but all routes were well-tolerated. There was no evidence of an immunogenicity advantage following SC or ID delivery, supporting IM delivery as the preferred route of administration.Trial RegistrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT00321061
创建时间:
2016-01-18
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务