遇见数据集

Difference in percent improvement in the parameters between CBOs mentored by communities and NGOs at baseline and endline (2010-2012), Andhra Pradesh.

收藏
Figshare2015-12-02 更新2026-04-29 收录
官方服务:

资源简介:

Note: ˆ Change (Actual improvement as percent potential improvement) = Actual improvement/Potential for improvement (100 - Baseline score); Baseline survey 2010 (BL) and Endline survey 2012 (EL); $Percent difference in improvement on parameters by strategy; * p-value were calculated using Mann-Whitney U test for difference between community-to community learning and NGO-to CBO learning.Percent improvements were calculated using the following formula:Column (4) = (Col.(3) - Col.(2))/(Col.(1) - Col.(2)) * 100.Column (7) = (Col.(6) - Col.(5))/(Col.(1) - Col.(5)) * 100.Column (8) = Col.(7) - Col.(4).

备注: ˆ 变化量(实际提升占潜在提升空间的百分比)= 实际提升/潜在提升空间(100 - 基线得分);2010年基线调查(BL)与2012年终线调查(EL); $ 不同策略下各参数的提升百分比差异; * p值通过曼-惠特尼U检验(Mann-Whitney U test)计算,用于对比社区间学习与非政府组织(NGO, Non-Governmental Organization)向社区组织(CBO, Community-Based Organization)学习的组间差异。 百分比提升的计算公式如下: 第(4)列 = (第(3)列 - 第(2)列)/(第(1)列 - 第(2)列) × 100。 第(7)列 = (第(6)列 - 第(5)列)/(第(1)列 - 第(5)列) × 100。 第(8)列 = 第(7)列 - 第(4)列。

创建时间:
2015-12-02
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务