Supplement to: Human-Centered Energy Landscapes: Empirical Evidence on Design Factors Shaping Acceptance of Renewable Energy Systems

This is the cleaned data and questionnaire (both in German language) supporting the findings of the paper: Human-Centered Energy Landscapes: Empirical Evidence on Design Factors Shaping Acceptance of Renewable Energy Systems (currently under review). Our study intends to seek innovative ways of designing renewable energy systems in a way that is more appealing to communities living nearby. Therefore, we developed landscape-integrative concepts for both ground-mounted PV (GMPV) and wind turbines (WT). After an initial empirical evaluation using interviews and subsequent adaptions to the designs, we designed a questionnaire to quantify the extent to which these designs contribute to the community acceptance of potential residents. 

Specifically, the questionnaire was designed to answer the following questions: 

RQ1: To what extent do traditionally and innovatively designed GMPV and WT differ in terms of their perception and acceptance?

RQ2: To what extent is the acceptance of such systems influenced by evaluation criteria of integrative design (perceived aesthetics, landscape impact, costs)?

Please refer to the related journal article for the references of the questionnaire items. 

We removed speeders, slow responders, straight‑liners, and participants with contradictory response patterns, resulting in a total of n = 104 data sets for further analysis.

本数据集包含支撑论文《以人为中心的能源景观：影响可再生能源系统接受度的设计因素实证研究》（目前处于审稿阶段）研究结论的经清洗后的数据与问卷（均为德语版本）。
本研究旨在探索更贴合周边社区需求的可再生能源系统创新设计路径，因此针对地面光伏系统（ground-mounted PV, GMPV）与风力发电机组（wind turbines, WT）开发了景观融合式设计理念。在通过访谈开展初步实证评估并对设计方案进行调整后，我们设计了问卷以量化此类设计对潜在居民社区接受度的贡献程度。

具体而言，本问卷旨在解答以下研究问题：
RQ1：传统设计与创新设计的地面光伏系统及风力发电机组在感知与接受度层面存在何种程度的差异？
RQ2：此类系统的接受度在多大程度上受融合设计评价标准（感知美学、景观影响、成本）的影响？

问卷题项的参考文献请参见相关期刊论文。

我们剔除了作答过快者、作答过慢者、直线作答者以及应答模式存在矛盾的参与者，最终得到共计n = 104份有效数据集用于后续分析。