five

Comparative study between strain gages for determination of autogenous shrinkage

收藏
DataCite Commons2020-08-28 更新2024-07-27 收录
下载链接:
https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/Comparative_study_between_strain_gages_for_determination_of_autogenous_shrinkage/7243754/1
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
ABSTRACT The Carlson-type strain gages are the most suitable for the measurement of autogenous shrinkage. However, your high cost is usually a limiting factor for your employment. A more economical alternative would be the use of Self-Temperature-Compensation Gages to be embedded in concrete. The main objective of this work was to verify if Self-Temperature-Compensation Gages can be used instead of the Carlson type to determine the autogenous shrinkage in high performance concrete. It was carried out measurements of the autogenous shrinkage, for the same concrete mix, using the two types of extensometers. The difference in the means of the autogenous shrinkage results between these two types of extensometers was typically less than 10x10-6 m/m.

摘要 卡尔森型应变计(Carlson-type strain gages)是最适用于自收缩(autogenous shrinkage)测量的装置。但其高昂的成本通常限制了其推广应用。更为经济的替代方案为采用埋置于混凝土中的自温度补偿应变计(Self-Temperature-Compensation Gages)。本研究的核心目标为验证自温度补偿应变计能否替代卡尔森型应变计,以测定高性能混凝土(high performance concrete)的自收缩性能。研究针对同一配合比的混凝土,分别采用两种引伸计(extensometers)开展了自收缩测试。两种引伸计的自收缩结果均值之差通常小于10×10^-6 m/m。
提供机构:
SciELO journals
创建时间:
2018-10-24
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作