Ridícula y malvada: La caracterización exasperada de la ideología de género en el blog de Padre Trevijano

Gender ideology represents a challenge for the Catholic Church, as it threatens not only the solidity of its moral principles but also its latent power in society. To defend itself against this threat, since the 1990s, religious sectors, in collaboration with neoconservatives, have been developing discourses aimed at delegitimising opponents by portraying them as malevolent and dangerous entities. Within this framework, the present article proposes a linguistic–discursive study of Father Trevijano's blog, which is particularly interesting for the way the speaker manipulates opposing positions to ridicule them and/or exacerbate their supposed wickedness. The study is based on pragmatic linguistics (Fuentes Rodríguez 2017[2020]), critical discourse analysis (van Dijk 2006 and 2010) and argumentation theory (Anscombre and Ducrot 1994) with its grammar (Lo Cascio 1991 and 2009; Fuentes Rodríguez and Alcaide Lara 2002). From a theoretical standpoint, the analysis follows the work of Morán Faúndes (2023) on the dismissive construction of gender ideology and the characterisation of its supporters as "total enemies" in the original writings of neoconservatives and Catholics.

性别意识形态对天主教会而言是一项挑战，因其不仅威胁到其道德原则的稳固性，更危及它在社会中潜藏的影响力。为抵御这一威胁，自20世纪90年代起，宗教界与新保守主义者（neoconservatives）携手构建话语体系，旨在通过将反对者塑造成恶意且危险的群体，以消解其合法性。在此框架下，本文针对特雷维贾诺神父（Father Trevijano）的博客展开语言-话语研究（linguistic-discursive study），该研究的独特价值在于其分析对象如何通过操控对立立场来嘲讽对方，或放大其被认定的邪恶特质。本研究以语用语言学（Pragmatic Linguistics，Fuentes Rodríguez 2017[2020]）、批判性话语分析（Critical Discourse Analysis，van Dijk 2006与2010）及论证理论（Argumentation Theory，Anscombre与Ducrot 1994）及其语法框架（Lo Cascio 1991、2009；Fuentes Rodríguez与Alcaide Lara 2002）为理论基础。从理论视角出发，本分析借鉴了Morán Faúndes（2023）的研究成果：该研究聚焦新保守主义者与天主教徒的原始文本中，对性别意识形态的消解性建构，以及将其支持者定性为“绝对敌人”的表述方式。