Table 3. A in A phylogenetic investigation of the taxonomically problematic Eucalyptus odorata complex (E. section Adnataria series Subbuxeales): evidence for extensive interspecific gene flow and reticulate evolution

Table 3. A summary of the clustering of mallee species in E. series Subbuxeales in both our ddRADseq and DArTseq networks (Fig. 2).
SpeciesMonophyletic cluster ddRADseqMonophyletic cluster DArTseqSame clustering in both datasets?E. albopurpureaYesYesNo – with E. froggattii in ddRADseq network and as a distinct cluster in DArTseq networkE. froggattiiYesYesNo – with E. albopurpurea in ddRADseq network and as a distinct cluster in DArTseq networkE. viridisNo – northern samples outside main E. viridis, E. aenea, E. castrensis clusterNo – northern samples outside main E. viridis, E. aenea, E. castrensis clusterYesE. aeneaYesYes – however, one sample (PSF90J) shows greater separation from other samples and links to the grey boxesNoE. castrensisSingle sample clustered with E. aeneaSingle sample clustered with E. aeneaYesE. cajuputeaNo – Flinders Ranges samples cluster with E. polybractea samples from Flinders Ranges and the remaining samples cluster intermingled with E. odorataNo – Flinders Ranges samples cluster with E. polybractea samples from Flinders Ranges and the remaining samples cluster intermingled with E. odorataYesE. odorataNo – sample PSF38 clusters with E. silvestris, remaining samples being intermingled with E. cajuputea not from Flinders RangesNo – sample PSF38 clusters with E. wimmerensis, remaining samples being intermingled with E. cajuputea not from Flinders RangesNo – sample PSF38 falls with E. silvestris in ddRAD and E. wimmerensis in DArTE. polybracteaNo – Flinders Ranges samples cluster with E. cajuputea samples also from Flinders RangesNo – Flinders Ranges samples cluster with E. cajuputea samples also from Flinders RangesNo – narrow clusters hold, but relationships among them varyE. filiformisClonalClonalNo – with E. polybractea and E. yarriambiack in ddRAD, and E. wimmerensis in DArTE. yarriambiackYesYesYesE. wimmerensisNo – subsp. grata sample (KRule10312) outside main clusterNo – subsp. grata sample (KRule10312) outside main clusterYesE. silvestrisYesYesYesE. hawkeriNo – PSF105E and PSF54A cluster together, KRule5370 clusters with E. silvestris and E. odorata PSF 38No – KRule5370 and PSF54A cluster together, PSF105E on lone branchNoE. walshiiYesYesNo – with E. wimmerensis subsp. grata in ddRAD, distinct cluster in DArTE. aff. polybractea (Mount Jeffcott) KRule3912Lone branch outside core E. odorata complexLone branch outside core E. odorata complexYesGenetically distinct Flinders Ranges samples (E. polybractea PSF 50B and E. cajuputea PSF 50P)Cluster together linked to other Wilpena Pond samplesSeparate branches outside core E. odorata complex not closely linked to other Wilpena Pound samplesNo
A comparison between the clustering of these datasets is also provided.

表3 本研究基于双酶切限制性位点相关DNA测序（ddRADseq）与DArTseq构建的系统发育网络中，桉属Subbuxeales系灌丛桉类的聚类结果汇总（图2）。
物种 ddRADseq单系聚类群 DArTseq单系聚类群 两类数据集聚类结果一致？
E. albopurpurea 是 是 否——在ddRADseq系统发育网络中与E. froggattii聚为一类，而在DArTseq系统发育网络中为独立聚类群
E. froggattii 是 是 否——在ddRADseq系统发育网络中与E. albopurpurea聚为一类，而在DArTseq系统发育网络中为独立聚类群
E. viridis 否——北部样本未归入E. viridis、E. aenea与E. castrensis的主聚类群 否——北部样本未归入E. viridis、E. aenea与E. castrensis的主聚类群 是
E. aenea 是 是——但有1个样本（PSF90J）与其他样本分化程度更高，且与灰色类群相连 否
E. castrensis 单样本与E. aenea聚为一类 单样本与E. aenea聚为一类 是
E. cajuputea 否——弗林德斯岭样本与同区域的E. polybractea样本聚为一类，其余样本与E. odorata样本混杂聚类 否——弗林德斯岭样本与同区域的E. polybractea样本聚为一类，其余样本与E. odorata样本混杂聚类 是
E. odorata 否——样本PSF38与E. silvestris聚为一类，其余样本与非弗林德斯岭的E. cajuputea样本混杂聚类 否——样本PSF38与E. wimmerensis聚为一类，其余样本与非弗林德斯岭的E. cajuputea样本混杂聚类 否——样本PSF38在ddRADseq网络中与E. silvestris聚为一类，在DArTseq网络中与E. wimmerensis聚为一类
E. polybractea 否——弗林德斯岭样本与同区域的E. cajuputea样本聚为一类 否——弗林德斯岭样本与同区域的E. cajuputea样本聚为一类 否——存在狭义聚类群，但类群间的系统发育关系存在差异
E. filiformis 无性系聚类 无性系聚类 否——在ddRADseq网络中与E. polybractea和E. yarriambiack聚为一类，在DArTseq网络中与E. wimmerensis聚为一类
E. yarriambiack 是 是 是
E. wimmerensis 否——grata亚种样本（KRule10312）未归入主聚类群 否——grata亚种样本（KRule10312）未归入主聚类群 是
E. silvestris 是 是 是
E. hawkeri 否——PSF105E与PSF54A聚为一类，KRule5370与E. silvestris和E. odorata样本PSF38聚为一类 否——KRule5370与PSF54A聚为一类，PSF105E处于单独分支 否——KRule5370与PSF54A聚为一类，PSF105E处于单独分支
E. walshii 是 是 否——在ddRADseq网络中与E. wimmerensis的grata亚种聚为一类，在DArTseq网络中为独立聚类群
E. aff. polybractea (杰科特山) KRule3912 独立分支，位于核心E. odorata复合群之外 独立分支，位于核心E. odorata复合群之外 是
遗传分化显著的弗林德斯岭样本（E. polybractea PSF 50B与E. cajuputea PSF 50P） 聚为一类，与其他威尔彭纳塘样本相连 独立分支，位于核心E. odorata复合群之外，与其他威尔彭纳塘样本无紧密关联 否

本研究同时提供了这两类数据集聚类结果的对比分析。