Supplementary materials: What works when: mapping patient and stakeholder engagement methods along the ten-step continuum framework

<b>These are peer-reviewed supplementary table</b>s<b> for the article '</b><b>What works when: mapping patient and stakeholder engagement methods along the ten-step continuum framework</b><b>' published in the </b><b><i>Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research</i></b><b>.</b>Supplemental Table A. CINAHL® (Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health) Database Search StringSupplemental Table B. Patient Participant Counts for Game Board ResponsesSupplemental Table C. Researcher Participant Counts for Game Board ResponsesSupplemental Table D. Other Stakeholder Participant Counts for Game Board ResponsesSupplemental Table E. Qualitative Summary – Concepts by Participant Group<b>Summary: </b><b>Aim:</b> This study provides a recommended ‘patient engagement translation table’ that identifies evidence-based methods for meaningful patient engagement along a ten-step framework for continuous engagement. <b>Materials &amp; methods:</b> We used a mixed methods research design to collect data on preferred engagement methods, including an environmental scan of available literature, interviews and focus groups with patient-centered outcomes research stakeholders to match methods with research steps and a modified Delphi process with subject matter experts to create the final translation table. <b>Results:</b> Evidence-based engagement methods included community partnerships, focus groups, interviews, meetings, sharing print materials, social media, storytelling, surveys and including patients as research team members. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our recommended patient engagement translation table is designed to assist investigators in determining appropriate engagement methods for meaningful interactions with stakeholders.

本文件为发表于《比较疗效研究杂志》(Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research) 的论文《何时奏效：基于十步连续参与框架绘制患者与利益相关方参与方法图谱》的同行评议补充表格。

补充表A：CINAHL®（Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health，护理与联合健康累积索引）数据库检索式
补充表B：游戏棋盘反馈的患者参与者人数统计
补充表C：游戏棋盘反馈的研究人员参与者人数统计
补充表D：游戏棋盘反馈的其他利益相关方参与者人数统计
补充表E：定性总结——按参与者群体划分的核心概念

**概述：**
**研究目的：** 本研究推出一款推荐的“患者参与转化表”，可依据十步连续参与框架，为实现有意义的患者参与识别循证参与方法。
**材料与方法：** 本研究采用混合方法研究设计，收集关于首选参与方法的相关数据：包括对现有文献开展系统性调研、与以患者为中心的结局研究利益相关方开展访谈及焦点小组讨论，以匹配参与方法与研究步骤；同时联合领域专家开展改良德尔菲法流程，以生成最终的患者参与转化表。
**研究结果：** 本次研究确定的循证患者参与方法涵盖社区合作、焦点小组讨论、个人访谈、会议、印刷材料分享、社交媒体应用、故事分享、问卷调查，以及吸纳患者作为研究团队成员。
**研究结论：** 本研究推荐的患者参与转化表，旨在协助研究者确定与利益相关方开展有意义互动的适配参与方法。