five

Reduction of False Convictions through Improved Identification Procedures: Further Refinements for Street Practice and Public Policy, 1983-2010, in five countries.

收藏
DataCite Commons2025-02-10 更新2025-04-16 收录
下载链接:
http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/NACJD/studies/34316
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
These data are part of NACJD's Fast Track Release and are distributed as they were received from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by NACJD for release, but not checked or processed except for the removal of direct identifiers. Users should refer to the accompanying readme file for a brief description of the files available with this collection and consult the investigator(s) if further information is needed. This study was a three part project which evaluated the procedural aspects of police lineups. The first part was a meta-analysis of existing laboratory data on comparative eyewitness accuracy rates for sequential versus simultaneous lineups. The second part was three experiments on the elements of current field lineup practices in simultaneous and sequential lineups. The third part was a field experiment in Tucson, Arizona, which tested double-blind simultaneous versus double-blind sequential lineups.

本数据集属于美国国家刑事司法数据档案库(National Archive of Criminal Justice Data,NACJD)快速发布项目的一部分,按照数据提交者提供的原始版本进行分发。发布所用的文件已由NACJD打包压缩,但仅移除了直接识别信息,未经过其他审核或处理。用户如需了解本次收录文件的简要说明,请查阅随附的自述文件;若需更多相关信息,请联系本研究的调查人员。本研究为一项分为三阶段的项目,旨在评估警方列队指认程序的相关环节。第一阶段为元分析,基于现有实验室数据,对比顺序式与同步式列队指认的目击者识别准确率。第二阶段包含三项实验,围绕当前同步式与顺序式列队指认的实地应用流程要素展开研究。第三阶段为在美国亚利桑那州图森市开展的实地实验,对双盲同步式列队指认与双盲顺序式列队指认进行了对比测试。
提供机构:
ICPSR - Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research
创建时间:
2016-04-28
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务