A Survey of the Trajectories Conceptual Framework: Dataset

We began by identifying three works—two papers and a book—that constitute the original academic sources of the <i>trajectories framework</i>. We then looked at bibliographical databases to identify works that cited any of these. Starting from over 250 distinct works, we narrowed the list down to 60, selecting only those papers that we considered to be actively engaging with the <i>trajectories framework</i>. We then analyzed the resulting corpus, carefully reading the papers and developing a coding scheme to classify them according to (i) the purpose behind using <i>trajectories</i> and (ii) which particular trajectory concepts they employed.本研究首先确定了构成轨迹框架（trajectories framework）原始学术来源的三项成果：两篇学术论文与一部专著。随后，我们通过文献书目数据库检索引用了上述三项成果的相关文献。我们从初始筛选得到的250余篇独立学术成果中进一步缩选范围，最终将候选列表缩减至60篇，仅保留那些我们认定为积极围绕轨迹框架展开探讨的学术论文。之后，我们对最终形成的语料库展开系统分析：逐篇仔细研读论文，并构建编码体系，依据两大维度对其进行分类：其一为使用轨迹框架的研究目的，其二为其所采用的具体轨迹类概念。