Additional file 4: of West Nile virus infection and interferon alpha treatment alter the spectrum and the levels of coding and noncoding host RNAs secreted in extracellular vesicles

Table S1. EV miRNAs significantly (FDR1) altered in response to WNV infection comparing to mock EVs. Table S2. EV miRNAs significantly (FDR1) altered in response to IFN-alpha treatment comparing to mock EVs. Table S3. EV sncRNAs significantly (FDR1) altered in response to WNV infection comparing to mock EVs. Table S4. EV sncRNAs significantly (FDR1) altered in response to IFN-alpha treatment comparing to mock EVs. Table S5. EV mRNAs significantly (FDR1) altered in response to WNV infection comparing to mock EVs. Table S6. EV mRNAs significantly (FDR1) altered in response to IFN-alpha treatment comparing to mock EVs. Table S7. GO terms associated with mRNAs exhibiting decreased levels in EVs secreted by WNV infected A549 cells. Table S8. GO terms associated with mRNAs exhibiting decreased levels in EVs secreted by IFN-alpha treated A549 cell. Table S9. PCR primers used in the study. (XLSX 349 kb)表S1：与假感染组细胞外囊泡（Extracellular Vesicles, EVs）相比，西尼罗病毒（West Nile Virus, WNV）感染后经错误发现率（False Discovery Rate, FDR）1检验显著差异表达的细胞外囊泡微小RNA（microRNAs, miRNAs）。 表S2：与假处理组细胞外囊泡相比，α干扰素（Interferon-alpha, IFN-α）处理后经FDR1检验显著差异表达的细胞外囊泡微小RNA。 表S3：与假感染组细胞外囊泡相比，西尼罗病毒感染后经FDR1检验显著差异表达的细胞外囊泡小非编码RNA（small non-coding RNAs, sncRNAs）。 表S4：与假处理组细胞外囊泡相比，α干扰素处理后经FDR1检验显著差异表达的细胞外囊泡小非编码RNA。 表S5：与假感染组细胞外囊泡相比，西尼罗病毒感染后经FDR1检验显著差异表达的细胞外囊泡信使RNA（messenger RNAs, mRNAs）。 表S6：与假处理组细胞外囊泡相比，α干扰素处理后经FDR1检验显著差异表达的细胞外囊泡信使RNA。 表S7：西尼罗病毒感染的A549细胞分泌的细胞外囊泡中表达下调的信使RNA所关联的基因本体术语（Gene Ontology terms, GO terms）。 表S8：α干扰素处理的A549细胞分泌的细胞外囊泡中表达下调的信使RNA所关联的基因本体术语。 表S9：本研究中使用的聚合酶链式反应引物（Polymerase Chain Reaction primers, PCR primers）。(XLSX 349 kb)