Supplementary materials to the article "Practices and attitudes toward replication in empirical translation and interpreting studies"

Abstract of the paper: This article presents the results of three studies on practices in and attitudes toward replication in empirical translation and interpreting studies. The first study reports on a survey in which 52 researchers in translation and interpreting with experience in empirical research answered questions about their practices in and attitudes toward replication. The survey data were complemented by a bibliometric study of publications indexed in the Bibliography of Interpreting and Translation (BITRA) (Franco Aixelá 2001–2019) that explicitly stated in the title or abstract that they were derived from a replication. In a second bibliometric study, a conceptual replication of Yeung’s (2017) study on the acceptance of replications in neuroscience journals was conducted by analyzing 131 translation and interpreting journals. The article aims to provide evidence-based arguments for initiating a debate about the need for replication in empirical translation and interpreting studies and its implications for the development of the discipline. Description of the supplementary materials: Material 1: questionnaire in English Material 2: questionnaire in Spanish Material 3: results of both questionnaires Material 4: corpus of identified replications in Translation and Interpreting Studies (TIS) Material 5: acceptance of replications in TIS journals论文摘要： 本文报告了三项针对实证翻译与口译研究中的可重复性实践与态度的研究成果。第一项研究基于一项问卷调查展开：共有52名具备实证研究经验的翻译与口译研究者参与，回答了关于其可重复性实践与相关态度的问题。本调查数据辅以一项文献计量研究：该研究针对《口译与翻译文献库》（Bibliography of Interpreting and Translation, BITRA）（Franco Aixelá 2001–2019）收录的文献展开，筛选出标题或摘要中明确标注其源自重复研究的出版物。第二项文献计量研究则针对131种翻译与口译期刊展开分析，对Yeung（2017）关于神经科学期刊可重复性接受度的研究进行了概念性重复研究。本文旨在为发起关于实证翻译与口译研究中可重复性研究的必要性及其对该学科发展的影响的辩论提供循证论据。 补充材料说明： 材料1：英文调查问卷 材料2：西班牙语调查问卷 材料3：两份调查问卷的统计结果 材料4：翻译与口译研究（Translation and Interpreting Studies, TIS）领域已识别的重复研究语料库 材料5：TIS期刊对重复研究的接受度情况