Estimates of comparative efficacy of ASAQ and AL for treatment of the first episode of malaria: Per protocol (PP) population.
收藏NIAID Data Ecosystem2026-03-09 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Estimates_of_comparative_efficacy_of_ASAQ_and_AL_for_treatment_of_the_first_episode_of_malaria_Per_protocol_PP_population_/1255382
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
Values are for all subjects completing the first episode of the study according to protocol (PP population).
aASAQ was considered non-inferior to AL if the lower limit of the one-sided 95% confidence interval was>−5%.
bP-value was determined by Fisher's exact test.
cP-value was determined by Wilcoxon's signed-rank test.
dP-value was determined by Chi-squared test.
Estimates of comparative efficacy of ASAQ and AL for treatment of the first episode of malaria: Per protocol (PP) population.
本研究数据均来自所有按照试验方案完成研究首阶段的受试者,即符合方案人群(Per Protocol population,PP人群)。
a 若单侧95%置信区间的下限大于−5%,则认为青蒿琥酯-阿莫地喹复方(Artesunate-Amodiaquine,ASAQ)非劣于蒿甲醚-本芴醇复方(Artemether-Lumefantrine,AL)。
b P值采用Fisher精确检验计算得出。
c P值采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验计算得出。
d P值采用卡方(Chi-squared)检验计算得出。
青蒿琥酯-阿莫地喹复方与蒿甲醚-本芴醇复方治疗首次疟疾发作的疗效对比评估:符合方案人群(Per Protocol population,PP人群)。
创建时间:
2014-12-01



