Figures S1 to S10: A data-driven approach to understanding the relations between geothermal exploration parameters: insights from Coso, Brady and Desert Peak, USA

Figure S1. Illustration of indicator mineral map datasets. Figure S2. Illustration of fault map datasets. Figure S3. Fault system at CGF. Figure S4. Fault system at BGF and DPGF. Figure S5. Illustration of LST datasets. Figure S6. Histograms and CDF plots of Two-Class Mineral Maps versus Fault Distance Maps. Figure S7. Histograms and CDF plots of Two-Class Mineral Maps versus Fault Density Maps. Figure S8. Histograms and CDF plots of Two-class Temperature Maps versus fault datasets. The top two rows correspond to Fault Distance Maps, while the bottom two rows correspond to Fault Density Maps. Figure S9. Histograms and CDF plots of Two-Class Mineral Maps versus Multiclass Temperature Map. Figure S10. The multiple comparisons of ANOVA. The plots show the mean estimates (circles) and 95% confidence intervals (bars) for each group of SGP. Red symbols highlight groups with Significant Differences from the control group (blue). Grey symbols indicate groups with Insignificant Differences where confidence intervals overlap with the control group.