Figures S1 to S10: A data-driven approach to understanding the relations between geothermal exploration parameters: insights from Coso, Brady and Desert Peak, USA

Figure S1. Illustration of indicator mineral map datasets. Figure S2. Illustration of fault map datasets. Figure S3. Fault system at CGF. Figure S4. Fault system at BGF and DPGF. Figure S5. Illustration of LST datasets. Figure S6. Histograms and CDF plots of Two-Class Mineral Maps versus Fault Distance Maps. Figure S7. Histograms and CDF plots of Two-Class Mineral Maps versus Fault Density Maps. Figure S8. Histograms and CDF plots of Two-class Temperature Maps versus fault datasets. The top two rows correspond to Fault Distance Maps, while the bottom two rows correspond to Fault Density Maps. Figure S9. Histograms and CDF plots of Two-Class Mineral Maps versus Multiclass Temperature Map. Figure S10. The multiple comparisons of ANOVA. The plots show the mean estimates (circles) and 95% confidence intervals (bars) for each group of SGP. Red symbols highlight groups with Significant Differences from the control group (blue). Grey symbols indicate groups with Insignificant Differences where confidence intervals overlap with the control group.补充图S1：指示矿物图数据集示意图。 补充图S2：断层图数据集示意图。 补充图S3：CGF处的断层系统。 补充图S4：BGF与DPGF处的断层系统。 补充图S5：低水位体系域（Lowstand Systems Tract, LST）数据集示意图。 补充图S6：两类矿物图与断层距离图的直方图及累积分布函数（Cumulative Distribution Function, CDF）绘图。 补充图S7：两类矿物图与断层密度图的直方图及累积分布函数绘图。 补充图S8：两类温度图与断层数据集的直方图及累积分布函数绘图；前两行对应断层距离图，后两行对应断层密度图。 补充图S9：两类矿物图与多分类温度图的直方图及累积分布函数绘图。 补充图S10：方差分析（Analysis of Variance, ANOVA）的多重比较结果。该图展示了SGP各组的均值估计值（圆形标记）与95%置信区间（误差棒）；红色标记突出显示了与对照组（蓝色标记）存在显著差异的组，灰色标记则表示置信区间与对照组重叠、无显著差异的组。