Research Data _ PPA.xlsx

This article makes a theoretical contribution to the fields of public policy and administration by systematically analyzing the intersection of crisis management and public administration. It develops an evidence-based theoretical framework to guide future research and practice. The study synthesizes a vast body of literature, organizing and assessing how crisis management and public administration have been studied over the decades. Drawing on a detailed analysis of 877 articles from a pool of 16,203, sourced from Web of Science and Scopus, the article employs both manual and automated coding methods. The analysis traces scholarly discussions on crisis management in public administration back to 1972, with a significant rise in publications from 2019 to 2023, largely driven by research on the COVID-19 pandemic. This increase in COVID-19-related research has overshadowed other pressing crises such as refugee movements, mass displacement, terrorism, and climate change. Additionally, the review highlights a geographic imbalance, with over 80% of studies originating from Western countries, limiting the diversity of perspectives on global crises. In response, the article proposes a research agenda that emphasizes the importance of public administration in addressing emerging global challenges. It proposes a proactive, rather than reactive, approach and calls for greater integration of advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence, into public governance.<br>

本研究通过系统性剖析危机管理与公共行政的交叉领域，为公共政策与行政学领域贡献了理论层面的增量成果。本研究构建了基于实证证据的理论框架，用以指导后续的学术研究与实践落地。研究整合了海量学术文献，梳理并评估了数十年来学界对危机管理与公共行政的研究脉络。本研究从Web of Science与Scopus两大数据库收录的16203篇文献中筛选出877篇样本，并结合人工编码与自动化编码两种方法展开深入分析。分析结果显示，学界对公共行政领域危机管理的学术探讨最早可追溯至1972年；2019至2023年间相关文献发表量出现显著增长，这一增长主要由新冠疫情相关研究推动。与此同时，新冠疫情相关研究的激增，使得难民流动、大规模流离失所、恐怖主义与气候变化等其他紧迫危机议题的研究关注度被大幅掩盖。此外，本综述还揭示了研究的地域失衡问题：超过80%的研究来自西方国家，这限制了全球危机议题研究视角的多样性。针对上述问题，本研究提出了一套研究议程，强调公共行政在应对新兴全球挑战中的核心作用。该议程倡导采用前瞻性而非被动应对的治理模式，并呼吁将人工智能（Artificial Intelligence, AI）等先进技术更广泛地融入公共治理实践。