Self-assessment of bone conduction hearing threshold using mobile audiometry: comparison with pure tone audiometry
收藏Mendeley Data2024-06-25 更新2024-06-27 收录
下载链接:
https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Self-assessment_of_bone_conduction_hearing_threshold_using_mobile_audiometry_comparison_with_pure_tone_audiometry/22795041/1
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
The aim of the research was to evaluate the feasibility of measuring the bone conduction hearing threshold using self-administered mobile audiometry. A single-centre, closed, cross-over trial was carried out on patients from the ENT Department. A mobile-based, self-administered, audiologist-assisted assessment of the bone conduction hearing threshold was carried out by means of the open-access, freeware app Hearing Test using two types of bone conduction headphones: professional B71 bone transducer and commercially available AfterShokz Openmove open-ear headphones. Seventy-seven ears. A test-retest examination revealed the lowest standard deviation for open-ear headphones at 3.33 dB (95% CI 2.92–3.79). When compared with pure tone audiometry, the intraclass correlations of 0.95 (95% CI 0.94–0.96) and 0.90 (95% CI 0.88–0.92) were obtained for the bone transducer and for the open-ear headphones, indicating excellent and good reliability, respectively. However, the regression slope of 0.67 was found for the air-bone gap when using open ear headphones, which was significantly different from 1 (p < 0.001). Open-ear headphones provide an alternative for estimating bone conduction once the air-bone gap has been adjusted by a factor of 1/0.6 7 ≅1.5. They demonstrate improved reproducibility over the bone transducer and are much easier to use with a mobile device. Trial Registration: Wroclaw Medical University, Science Support Centre, BW60/2020
本研究旨在评估采用自助式移动听力学检测测量骨传导听阈(bone conduction hearing threshold)的可行性。针对耳鼻喉科(Ear, Nose and Throat Department, ENT)患者,本研究开展了一项单中心、封闭式交叉试验。研究借助开源免费的移动应用程序《Hearing Test》,采用两类骨传导耳机——专业级B71骨传导换能器与市售AfterShokz Openmove开放式耳机,完成了基于移动设备、由听力学专业人员辅助的自助式骨传导听阈评估,共纳入77耳。
复测分析结果显示,开放式耳机组的标准差最低,为3.33 dB(95%置信区间:2.92~3.79)。与纯音测听(pure tone audiometry)结果对比,骨传导换能器组与开放式耳机组的组内相关系数分别为0.95(95%置信区间:0.94~0.96)与0.90(95%置信区间:0.88~0.92),分别表明二者具备极佳与良好的可靠性。但采用开放式耳机时,气骨导差(air-bone gap)的回归斜率为0.67,与理论值1存在显著统计学差异(p < 0.001)。经校正后,即按1/0.67≈1.5的系数调整气骨导差,开放式耳机可作为骨传导检测的替代方案。相较于骨传导换能器,开放式耳机的重现性更优,且在移动设备上的操作更为简便。
试验注册:弗罗茨瓦夫医科大学科学支持中心,注册号BW60/2020
创建时间:
2023-06-28



