Global funders who require data archiving as a condition of grants

Open access and open data are becoming more prominent on the global research agenda. Funders are increasingly requiring grantees to deposit their raw research data in appropriate public archives or stores in order to facilitate the validation of results and further work by other researchers. 

While the rise of open access has fundamentally changed the academic publishing landscape, the policies around data are reigniting the conversation around what universities can and should be doing to protect the assets generated at their institution. The main difference between an open access and open data policy is that there is not already a precedent or status quo of how academia deals with the dissemination of research that is not in the form of a traditional ‘paper’ publication.

As governments and funders of research see the benefit of open content, the creation of recommendations, mandates and enforcement of mandates are coming thick and fast.

开放获取（Open Access）与开放数据（Open Data）在全球科研议程中的地位愈发凸显。科研资助方日益要求受资助者将原始科研数据提交至合规的公共档案库或存储平台，以推动研究结果的验证工作，并便利其他科研人员开展后续研究。

尽管开放获取的崛起从根本上重塑了学术出版格局，但围绕数据的相关政策却再度引发了关于高校应当如何保护本校产出的科研资产的讨论。开放获取与开放数据政策的核心差异在于，学界尚未就非传统"纸质出版物"形式的科研成果传播方式形成既定先例或行业现状（status quo）。

随着各国政府与科研资助方日益认识到开放内容的价值，相关建议、强制要求及强制要求的落地执行正密集出台。