Data from: Constrained variation in the internal architecture of avian wing bones

· R codes 1-4 show how the various steps of the analysis were run· Additional methods and additional results contains all supplementary methods and results (i.e. Appendices, Supplementary Tables and Figures, excluding Figs S5-S13, which are shown separately in pdf, see below)· Fig. S5: results for proximal humeral structural parameters. A-B: DF1-DF2 and DF2-DF3 biplots, with ecological clusters mapped on them. C-H: boxplots DFs and parameters of interest (identified as detailed in the Main Text), for the eco-clusters which yielded significant differences from pairwise comparisons· Fig. 6A-E: traitgrams for proximal humeral parameters of interest (identified as detailed in the Main Text)· Fig. S7: results for humeral diaphyseal structural parameters. A-B: DF1-DF2 and DF2-DF3 biplots, with ecological clusters mapped on them. C-K: boxplots DFs and parameters of interest (identified as detailed in the Main Text), for the eco-clusters which yielded significant differences from pairwise comparisons· Fig. S8A-N: further boxplots of humeral diaphyseal parameters of interest (identified as detailed in the Main Text), for the eco-clusters which yielded significant differences from pairwise comparisons· Fig. S9A-M: traitgrams for humeral diaphyseal parameters of interest (identified as detailed in the Main Text)· Fig. S10: results for distal humeral structural parameters. A-B: DF1-DF2 and DF2-DF3 biplots, with ecological clusters mapped on them. C-E: boxplots of DFs and parameters of interest (identified as detailed in the Main Text), for the eco-clusters which yielded significant differences from pairwise comparisons. F-G: traitgrams for distal humeral parameters of interest· Fig. S11: results for proximal ulnar structural parameters. A-B: DF1-DF2 and DF2-DF3 biplots, with ecological clusters mapped on them. C-D: boxplots of the parameters of interest (identified as detailed in the Main Text)· Fig. S12: results for ulnar diaphyseal structural parameters. A-B: DF1-DF2 and DF2-DF3 biplots, with ecological clusters mapped on them. C-N: boxplots of parameters of interest (identified as detailed in the Main Text)· Fig. S13: results for distal ulnar structural parameters. A-B: DF1-DF2 and DF2-DF3 biplots, with ecological clusters mapped on them. C-G: boxplots of DFs and parameters of interest (identified as detailed in the Main Text), for the eco-clusters which yielded significant differences from pairwise comparisons. H-I: traitgrams for distal humeral parameters of interest· EcolMatrix_toRunClustAnalysis.rds: R item to be imported (as detailed in R code 3) to re-run the cluster analysis· Tables S1-S2: Excel files with raw results for morphological and ecological data· time-tree.nex: time-calibrated phylogeny used in the work (in nexus format)· Hum_Diap_Data.rds: R item to be imported (as detailed in R code 4) to re-run the eco-morphological analysis· R代码1至4展示了本研究分析各步骤的运行流程 · 补充方法与补充结果文件包含全部附属方法与结果（即附录、补充表与补充图，但不含图版S5至S13；该部分图版以单独PDF文件呈现，详见下文） · 图版S5：肱骨近端结构参数分析结果。A-B为DF1-DF2与DF2-DF3双标图，其上标注了生态聚类分组；C-H为经两两比较存在显著差异的生态聚类的主成分得分（DFs）与目标参数箱线图（目标参数定义详见正文） · 图6A-E：目标肱骨近端参数的系统发育性状图（traitgrams）（目标参数定义详见正文） · 图版S7：肱骨干结构参数分析结果。A-B为DF1-DF2与DF2-DF3双标图，其上标注了生态聚类分组；C-K为经两两比较存在显著差异的生态聚类的主成分得分（DFs）与目标参数箱线图（目标参数定义详见正文） · 图版S8A-N：经两两比较存在显著差异的生态聚类的额外目标肱骨干参数箱线图（目标参数定义详见正文） · 图版S9A-M：目标肱骨干参数的系统发育性状图（traitgrams）（目标参数定义详见正文） · 图版S10：肱骨远端结构参数分析结果。A-B为DF1-DF2与DF2-DF3双标图，其上标注了生态聚类分组；C-E为经两两比较存在显著差异的生态聚类的主成分得分（DFs）与目标参数箱线图（目标参数定义详见正文）；F-G为目标肱骨远端参数的系统发育性状图（traitgrams） · 图版S11：尺骨近端结构参数分析结果。A-B为DF1-DF2与DF2-DF3双标图，其上标注了生态聚类分组；C-D为目标参数箱线图（目标参数定义详见正文） · 图版S12：尺骨干结构参数分析结果。A-B为DF1-DF2与DF2-DF3双标图，其上标注了生态聚类分组；C-N为目标参数箱线图（目标参数定义详见正文） · 图版S13：尺骨远端结构参数分析结果。A-B为DF1-DF2与DF2-DF3双标图，其上标注了生态聚类分组；C-G为经两两比较存在显著差异的生态聚类的主成分得分（DFs）与目标参数箱线图（目标参数定义详见正文）；H-I为目标肱骨远端参数的系统发育性状图（traitgrams） · EcolMatrix_toRunClustAnalysis.rds：R数据对象，可按R代码3中的说明导入该文件以重新运行聚类分析 · 附表S1-S2：包含形态学与生态学数据原始结果的Excel文件 · time-tree.nex：本研究使用的时间校准系统发育树文件（格式为NEXUS） · Hum_Diap_Data.rds：R数据对象，可按R代码4中的说明导入该文件以重新运行生态形态学分析