FOX CORP Balance Sheet

Recommendation:

Long Fox (FOXA) at current prices

Thesis:

FOXA shares have sold off aggressively YTD on fears that an early NFL rights renewal will result in materially weaker financials and/or the company ceding NFL games to streamers/competitors. We believe the impacts of an NFL renewal will be far better than the market fears, the underlying business financials are robust, there are positive revisions to estimates (political advertising, World Cup, Tubi), all creating an opportunity to buy a quality business with catalysts at a discounted price. We see 20% upside in the near-term and ~30%% upside over the next 12 months (12x a blend of our ’27 and ’28 FCF/share)

Price target:

Our valuation suggests a $68 price target for FOX (18% upside) using 9.0x our consolidated '27 EBITDA (that is 3% above consensus). This compares to a '27 EV/EBITDA multiple range of 7.5-10.5x over the last year. The $68 target equates to ~11x a blend of our ’27/’28 FCF/share and 13.5x our ‘27/’28 EPS (using a blend to normalize for political years), which we view as attractive for the business given its moat in news programming, multiple levers for upward revisions, and robust FCF/share growth supported by its share repurchases (we estimate 6% CAGR from ’25 –’29).

Our $68 price target is also supported by a sum-of-the-parts base case which assumes:

This is equivalent to 3.4x '26 sales (21% y/y growth) and compares to NFLX at 8x with 13% y/y growth, AMCX at 0.8x with -3% y/y growth, FUBO at 0.8x with ~5% y/y growth, and STRZ at 0.7x with -2% y/y growth

8x cable EBITDA

5x TV ex. Tubi EBITDA

8x 2030 Tubi EBITDA (~15% margin) discounted back.

$475m for FLUT stake (live price)

0 value for FanDuel option

$2.1b for NPV of tax shield from Disney transaction

0 value for its Studio lot

Apple DCF

Netflix DCF

Microsoft DCF

Facebook DCF

Tesla DCF

Amazon DCF

Apple WACC

Netflix WACC

Microsoft WACC

Facebook WACC

Tesla WACC

Amazon WACC

Apple Intrinsic Value

Netflix Intrinsic Value

Microsoft Intrinsic Value

Facebook Intrinsic Value

Tesla Intrinsic Value

Amazon Intrinsic Value

Situation overview:

As linear television has become increasingly secularly challenged (predominantly due to the rising of streaming services), Fox wisely positioned itself as a live sports and news company - the two categories that continue to command viewership and monetization.

Fox News momentum

Even after the recent sell-off FOXA shares are up nearly 100% over the last 2 years, primarily attributable to the success of Fox News. The cable channel has garnered meaningful growth in engagement and is beginning to rival that of the broadcast networks. Advertising volumes and CPMs, and affiliate rate increases have followed.

Evidence of this is the company's 2.5% CAGR in cable distribution revenue over the last 3 years, which implies a HSD-LDD % growth in pricing per sub as industry subscribers have declined 7-8% per annum. This pricing power stems from Fox's loyal audience leading to dominance in cable ratings. We believe this continues and coupled with a deceleration in cord cutting speaks to accelerating revenue growth from here.  Cable segment EBITDA (~84% of consolidated EBITDA in FY25) had an 8% CAGR over that same 3 year period.

Fox strength in sports portfolio.

Fox has one of the leading sports rights portfolios in the US including prominent packages for NFL, NCAA, MLB, NASCAR, and the FIFA World Cup. These games are typically shown on Fox's broadcast network but occasionally used for programming on cable channels like FS1 as well.

Industry subscriber declines somewhat abating

The number of subscribers in the linear video ecosystem (traditional cable/satellite packages + virtual services like YouTube TV, Fubo, etc) is a key input for Fox’s revenue trajectory. Total linear subscriber declines accelerated from -5% in 2020/2021 to 7-8% by late 2024 / early 2025. In recent quarters, however, subscriber declines are abating back to 5-6% levels as 1) cable packages are now bundling in streaming services, 2) distributors are offering "skinnier" packages with just core sports/news channels (i.e. YouTube TV's recent Sports package), and 3) cable companies are increasingly pushing video in their go-to-market after years of deemphasizing video/bundle attach rates. 

Fox also recently launched FoxOne, its own direct-to-consumer offering for consumers to get access to live Fox sports and Fox news without needing a linear TV / cable TV package. Although in early stages, FoxOne helps the trajectory of subscribers for Fox's channels in the coming years. We estimate growth in FoxOne is contributing ~200bps of revenue growth at Cable and Television each.

Variant view:

NFL situation

We believe the market is wrong to sell-off Fox on perceived NFL renewal risk because the company will pass nearly all the increased costs on to distributors through retrans fees as it has in prior cycles.  

Fox's package of Sunday afternoon games aligns well with a broadcaster that has local market reach.

Streamers have shown more interest in eventized properties with better branding like Christmas Day, Black Friday, Thursday Night Football. We believe there is more risk of streaming displacement for Sunday Night or Monday Night than there would be for Fox's Sunday afternoon slate. 

There is also scope for shedding other sports rights to mitigate the total cost increase.  The ~20% sell-off prices in the worst-case outcome in our view that the company would somehow absorb ~$1b of extra costs net of any offsets.

Television segment and sports related revisions should impact a negligible portion of overall enterprise value

Although the broadcast network and sports portfolio gets a lot of attention and has driven the recent stock decline, we believe the segment drives a minimal portion of the company's overall value. The company's cable segment (primarily Fox News) is 80-90%+ of company EBITDA in a given year and has superior economics (40%+ EBITDA margins) to the television segment (~10% EBITDA margins). Investors also have much more visibility into sustainable growth at Cable given its longer-term story of better monetizing Fox News while results at Television are much more lump based on sports calendars and political advertising $s.

Accordingly we believe the Cable segment accounts for ~90% of the overall enterprise value

Today’s ~$30b of enterprise value represents ~9.0x the cable segment, essentially receiving the rest of the business (including Tubi) for free. Although we do not shrug off the potential for TV segment EBITDA to be revised lower by a few hundred million in the coming years (from NFL pressure), we believe there is strong valuation support at these levels.  

Why the opportunity exists:

Background on current NFL media rights landscape

Fox's differentiation vs. its media peer group has been its exposure to live news & sports, especially the NFL (incl. postseason and Super Bowls). The NFL continues to garner outsized share of viewership/engagement and therefore commands meaningful premiums for advertising and affiliate.

The current NFL media rights were signed in 2021 and the deals took into effect for the '23-'24 season. Most of the contracts, including Fox's, were 11 year deals (running through the '33-34 season) but give the NFL the option to exit the deals early after the '29-'30 season. Note that change of control provisions would allow the NFL to opt out of its deal with Paramount by 2027.

In the current agreement, Fox pays an average of $2.25b per year over the duration of the contract for its Sunday package as well as postseason games and the 3 Super Bowls it will carry over that time period.

Although the average is $2.25b, the actual in-period recognized opex varies based on internal accounting escalators over the life on the contract and can be lumpy depending on timing of Super Bowls.

The NFL has been increasingly transitioning more games to streaming platforms (think TNF on Amazon Prime, occasional exclusive games on Netflix/Peacock, and the Sunday Ticket package on YouTube TV). While incumbents will tout the unparalleled reach of broadcast networks, it is worth noting that more subscribers in the US have Netflix and Prime than have linear TV.

Headlines of the early NFL renewal drove sell off

The NFL has not shied away from publicly discussing their intentions to potentially open up the rights agreements early in an attempt to negotiate higher values - motivated by the NFL's materially higher viewership vs. other sports leagues (i.e. when compared to the NBA's lucrative rights deal in 2024). Although it was understood that the NFL was going to seek to negotiate early (NFL commissioner Roger Goodell was on CNBC late 2025 discussing his intentions), the market was surprised to learn that a new deal could go into effect as early as the '26-27 season (various press including NYT on 2/4). Despite a strong print from Fox on 2/4, sentiment about the NFL overshadowed and the stock sold off 25% in the month after earnings (now down 21% YTD).

Fears are driven by the assumption that Fox will have to pay more for its existing games as well as the fear that a higher portion of games may be carved away from Fox and given to streamers that are willing to bid much more (Netflix, Amazon, YouTube, Apple, etc.)

Our scenario modeling arrives at $1b of EBITDA impact in our base case renewal assumption (AAV step-up of 1.5x with the contract still ending in 2033) (see Scenario 1 in Exhibit 5). Historically the company has passed along sports rights inflation by raising prices on distributors (and in turn distributors raising prices on consumers). We believe the company would act similarly for any upcoming renewal (supported by management commentary at recent conferences). To us, $1b of EBITDA impact represents the worst case realized outcome.

We would highlight that on Friday 3/13, CNBC reported that Paramount was close to an agreement with the NFL that would garner a 1.5-1.6x step-up and run through the '33-'34 season (in-line with our base case for Fox). This effectively means the NFL will get rid of its early opt out clause in exchange for the network paying a higher fee for the duration of the contract.

The ~20% sell-off YTD (~$6.5b of market cap loss) represents the full ~$1b of impact at 6.5x and therefore we believe the magnitude of the sell-off is unjustified and the risk/reward at these levels is attractive.

Sports betting weakness from prediction markets also pressuring shares

Fox also owns 2.5% of Flutter Entertainment (worth ~$475m or 2% of FOXA market cap) and an option to purchase 18.6% of FanDuel. Fox has until Dec 2030 to exercise the option; the price to exercise was $4.8b as of Dec 2025 and escalates at 5% annually.

In July 2025, Flutter repurchased 5% of FanDuel from Boyd Gaming for $1.55b. This implied $31b valuation would put Fox's option in the money by ~$1b.

FLUT and DKNG are down nearly 80% from their highs from mid-2025 as fears around prediction markets build.

The fear around prediction markets and resulting de-rating of online sports betting led to Fox's stake in FLUT losing ~$1b in value and its FanDuel option potentially losing ~$1b in value. Illustratively this ~$2b is ~$4 of headwind per share (5-7% of the FOXA share price in 2H25). 

Fundamentals for the year remain strong

We believe Fox also has an attractive backdrop to drive street numbers higher through the year, underpinned by advertising revenue upside from the FIFA World Cup, the midterm political cycle, and continued momentum at Tubi. We are 4%/3% above the street for F26/F27 EBITDA.

Valuation

After the recent sell-off, FOXA is trading at 8.6x '26 EBITDA and 8.0x '27 EBITDA which we view as attractive for the company which should grow EBITDA at a LSD CAGR through the end of the decade, converts 70%+ of its EBITDA into FCF, and is buying back a meaningful portion of stock (we estimate $2.3b in FY26 which is roughly ~10% of current market cap) given its underlevered balance sheet (1.3x TTM leverage exiting the most recent reported quarter).

We value FOXA at 9.0x our ’27 EBITDA and arrive at a $68 target (18% upside). This compares to its range of 7.5-10.5x over the last year (Exhibit 2). We believe the higher end of the range is reasonable given the improvement in the 1) linear subscriber ecosystem starting in late 2025, 2) higher affiliate pricing at Fox News, and 3) the improvement in EBITDA trajectory at Tubi

Our price target is also supported by a sum of the parts (Exhibit 3)

In our sum of the parts we also contemplate value for the aforementioned Flutter stake, the FanDuel option, the NPV of a tax shield created by its 2019 transaction with Disney, and the value of its studio lot (Disney will be vacating its tenancy of the space this year).

Home Depot Relative Valuation

Walmart Relative Valuation

CVS Relative Valuation

Goldman Sachs Relative Valuation

Morgan Stanley Relative Valuation

Caterpillar Relative Valuation

Deere Relative Valuation

Hilton Relative Valuation

Yum Brands Relative Valuation

Fedex Relative Valuation

Risks:

Negative NFL headlines

Incremental negative press around streamers interest in packages or speculated rights step-ups could add downside volatility to Fox shares.

Event path largely uncertain

The timeline for any clearing event (rights renewal and subsequent raising of distributor rates) is largely uncertain. Rights renewals with the different partners could be staggered or could happen all at once. Visibility into when market fears would abate is low.

投资建议：
当前股价下做多福克斯A类股（FOXA）

投资论点：
今年年初至今（year-to-date, YTD），市场因担忧美国国家橄榄球联盟（National Football League, NFL）提前续约将导致公司财务表现显著疲弱，或福克斯将把NFL赛事转播权让渡给流媒体平台或竞争对手，导致FOXA股价大幅下挫。我们认为，NFL续约带来的影响将远好于市场担忧，核心业务财务状况稳健，多项因素将推动盈利预期上调（政治广告、世界杯、Tubi流媒体平台），这些共同创造了以折扣价格买入优质标的、并享受多重催化因素的投资机会。我们预计短期股价有20%上行空间，未来12个月内上行空间约30%（以2027与2028年自由现金流每股（Free Cash Flow, FCF）的加权平均值乘以12倍计算）

目标价：
我们的估值模型显示，以2027年合并税息折旧及摊销前利润（Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization, EBITDA）的9.0倍计算，福克斯（FOX）的目标价为68美元（上行空间18%），较市场一致预期高出3%。过去一年，该公司2027年企业价值/EBITDA（EV/EBITDA，Enterprise Value/EBITDA）估值区间为7.5-10.5x。68美元的目标价对应2027/2028年FCF每股加权平均值的11倍，以及2027/2028年每股收益（Earnings Per Share, EPS）加权平均值的13.5倍（采用加权平均以平滑政治广告大年的波动），考虑到该公司在新闻节目领域的护城河、多项盈利上调催化因素，以及股份回购支撑的稳健FCF每股增速（我们预计2025-2029年复合年增长率（Compound Annual Growth Rate, CAGR）为6%），该估值水平具备吸引力。

我们68美元的目标价也得到了分部估值法（Sum-of-the-Parts）的支撑，该基准情景假设：
该估值对应2026年销售额的3.4倍（同比增长21%），对比奈飞（Netflix）的8倍（同比增长13%）、AMCX的0.8倍（同比下降3%）、Fubo的0.8倍（同比增长约5%）以及STRZ的0.7倍（同比下降2%）

8倍有线业务EBITDA
5倍不含Tubi的电视业务EBITDA
8倍2030年Tubi业务EBITDA（利润率约15%）并折现
4.75亿美元的Flutter Entertainment（FLUT）股份市值（按当前市价计算）
FanDuel期权价值为0
迪士尼交易产生的税盾净现值为21亿美元
其演播室地块价值为0

苹果折现现金流（Discounted Cash Flow, DCF）模型
奈飞DCF模型
微软DCF模型
Meta（原Facebook）DCF模型
特斯拉DCF模型
亚马逊DCF模型
苹果加权平均资本成本（Weighted Average Cost of Capital, WACC）
奈飞WACC
微软WACC
Meta WACC
特斯拉WACC
亚马逊WACC
苹果内在价值
奈飞内在价值
微软内在价值
Meta内在价值
特斯拉内在价值
亚马逊内在价值

行业概况：
随着线性电视长期面临挑战（主要源于流媒体服务的崛起），福克斯明智地将自身定位为直播体育与新闻内容提供商——这两大品类仍牢牢占据收视与变现优势。

福克斯新闻频道增长动能
即便经历近期下挫，FOXA股价在过去两年仍累计上涨近100%，这主要得益于福克斯新闻频道的成功。该有线频道的用户参与度实现显著增长，已开始逼近广播电视网的水平，广告投放量、每千次展示费用（Cost Per Mille, CPM）以及会员费均随之提升。

佐证这一点的是，过去三年该公司有线频道分销收入的复合年增长率为2.5%，由于行业付费用户以每年7-8%的速度下滑，这意味着每用户订阅收入的增速为中低个位数百分比。这种定价能力源于福克斯拥有忠实受众，因此在有线电视收视率中占据主导地位。我们认为这一态势将持续，叠加有线解约趋势（cord-cutting）的放缓，将推动收入增速进一步提升。有线板块EBITDA（约占2025财年合并EBITDA的84%）在同期的复合年增长率为8%。

福克斯体育版权组合优势
福克斯拥有美国顶尖的体育赛事转播权组合，包括NFL、NCAA、MLB、NASCAR以及国际足联世界杯等重磅赛事版权。这些赛事通常在福克斯广播电视网播出，偶尔也会在FS1等有线频道播出。

线性电视用户下滑趋势有所放缓
线性视频生态系统（传统有线电视/卫星套餐+YouTube TV、Fubo等虚拟流媒体服务）的付费用户规模是影响福克斯收入走势的关键变量。整体线性付费用户的下滑速度从2020/2021年的-5%加快至2024年末/2025年初的7-8%。但近几个季度，用户下滑幅度有所放缓，回升至5-6%的水平，原因在于：1）有线电视套餐现已捆绑流媒体服务；2）运营商推出仅包含核心体育/新闻频道的“精简版”套餐（如YouTube TV近期推出的体育套餐）；3）有线电视运营商在多年弱化视频/捆绑套餐的推广后，如今愈发将视频服务作为核心获客手段。

福克斯近期还推出了自有直接面向消费者的服务FoxOne，用户无需订阅线性电视/有线电视套餐即可观看福克斯直播体育与新闻内容。尽管该服务仍处于早期阶段，但FoxOne将有助于未来几年福克斯频道的用户规模增长。我们预计，FoxOne将为有线与电视板块各贡献约200个基点的收入增长。

市场分歧观点：
NFL局势
我们认为，市场因所谓的NFL续约风险抛售福克斯股票是错误的，因为该公司将像此前周期一样，通过向运营商收取转播费将几乎所有新增成本转嫁出去。

福克斯的周日下午赛事转播权套餐与拥有本地市场覆盖优势的广播电视网高度适配。流媒体平台对圣诞大战、黑色星期五、周四夜赛等更具品牌效应的赛事版权兴趣更浓。我们认为，周日夜赛或周一夜赛被流媒体分流的风险，要高于福克斯的周日下午赛事板块。

此外，福克斯还可通过让渡其他体育赛事转播权来缓解整体成本上涨压力。本次约20%的年初至今股价下挫（市值损失约65亿美元），已充分反映了我们认为的最糟糕情景：即公司在扣除所有抵消项后，需额外承担约10亿美元的成本。

电视板块及体育相关盈利调整对整体企业价值影响微乎其微
尽管广播电视网与体育赛事板块受到大量关注，也是近期股价下跌的导火索，但我们认为该板块对公司整体企业价值的贡献微乎其微。该公司的有线板块（主要为福克斯新闻频道）在任意财年的EBITDA占比均达到80-90%以上，且利润率远高于电视板块：有线板块EBITDA利润率超过40%，而电视板块仅约10%。投资者对有线板块的可持续增长也有更清晰的预期，因为福克斯新闻频道的长期变现逻辑更为明确，而电视板块的业绩则高度依赖体育赛事日历与政治广告收入，波动性更强。

因此我们认为，有线板块约占公司整体企业价值的90%。当前约300亿美元的企业价值对应有线板块的9.0倍估值，相当于免费获得了公司其余业务（包括Tubi）。尽管我们并未忽视电视板块EBITDA因NFL续约压力在未来几年可能下调数亿美元的风险，但我们认为当前股价水平具备强劲的估值支撑。

为何该投资机会存在：
当前NFL媒体版权格局背景
福克斯与其媒体同行的差异化在于其对直播新闻与体育赛事的布局，尤其是NFL版权（包括季后赛与超级碗赛事）。NFL的收视与用户参与度始终远超其他体育联盟，因此其广告与会员费定价具备显著溢价。

当前的NFL媒体版权协议于2021年签署，2023-2024赛季正式生效。包括福克斯在内的多数合同均为11年期（至2033-2034赛季），但NFL拥有在2029-2030赛季后提前终止合同的选择权。值得注意的是，控制权变更条款允许NFL在2027年前终止与派拉蒙的合作协议。

在当前协议中，福克斯为其周日赛事转播权、季后赛以及在此期间承办的3场超级碗赛事，平均每年需支付22.5亿美元。

尽管平均年费为22.5亿美元，但根据合同内部的价格上调条款，当期确认的运营支出会有所波动，且受超级碗赛事举办时间的影响，支出会呈现阶段性集中的特点。

NFL正愈发多地将更多赛事转向流媒体平台，比如周四夜赛在亚马逊Prime视频播出，部分独家赛事在Netflix/Peacock播出，以及YouTube TV获得的周日Ticket套餐。尽管传统广播电视网会强调自身覆盖范围的无可比拟性，但值得注意的是，美国拥有Netflix与Prime视频订阅用户的数量已超过传统线性电视用户。

NFL提前续约相关报道引发股价下挫
NFL毫不避讳地公开讨论其提前开放版权谈判的意向，旨在争取更高的版权费用——这一动机源于NFL的收视表现远优于其他体育联盟（如对比2024年NBA的高额版权协议）。尽管市场早已预期NFL将提前启动谈判（NFL总裁罗杰·古德尔于2025年末接受CNBC采访时提及相关意向），但市场仍对新协议最早可于2026-2027赛季生效的消息感到意外（包括《纽约时报》在内的多家媒体于2月4日对此进行了报道）。尽管福克斯在2月4日发布了强劲的财报，但市场对NFL的担忧盖过了利好消息，股价在财报发布后一个月内下挫25%（目前年初至今累计下跌21%）。

市场的担忧源于两个假设：一是福克斯需为现有赛事版权支付更高费用，二是更多赛事版权将被剥离给出价更高的流媒体平台（如Netflix、亚马逊、YouTube、苹果等）。

我们的情景模型显示，在基准续约假设下（版权费用年均上涨1.5倍，合同仍至2033年到期，详见图表5中的情景1），EBITDA将受到10亿美元的影响。历史上，福克斯通过向运营商提高转播费（进而运营商向消费者提价）来转嫁体育版权成本的上涨。我们认为，公司将在即将到来的续约谈判中采取类似举措（近期财报会议上的管理层言论也支持这一判断）。对我们而言，10亿美元的EBITDA影响已是最糟糕的实际落地情景。

我们在此强调，3月13日周五，CNBC报道派拉蒙已接近与NFL达成协议，版权费用年均上涨1.5-1.6倍，合同至2033-2034赛季到期（与我们对福克斯的基准假设一致）。这实际上意味着，NFL将放弃提前终止合同的选择权，以换取合作网络在合同期内支付更高的版权费用。

本次约20%的年初至今股价下挫（市值损失约65亿美元），已按照6.5倍的倍数充分定价了10亿美元的EBITDA影响，因此我们认为本次下挫的幅度缺乏合理性，当前股价水平的风险收益比极具吸引力。

预测市场相关体育博彩业务疲软也对股价形成压制
福克斯还持有Flutter Entertainment（FLUT）2.5%的股份（市值约4.75亿美元，占FOXA市值的2%）以及一项收购FanDuel 18.6%股权的期权。福克斯需在2030年12月前行使该期权；截至2025年12月，行权价为48亿美元，且每年以5%的速度递增。

2025年7月，Flutter以15.5亿美元从Boyd Gaming手中回购了5%的FanDuel股权，这意味着FanDuel的估值为310亿美元，将使福克斯的期权价值增加约10亿美元。

FLUT与DraftKings（DKNG）的股价较2025年中期的高点累计下跌近80%，市场对预测业务的担忧情绪升温。

对预测业务的担忧以及在线体育博彩估值的下调，导致福克斯持有的FLUT股份市值缩水约10亿美元，FanDuel期权的潜在价值也减少约10亿美元。粗略估算，这两项合计约20亿美元的损失相当于每股拖累4美元（占2025年下半年FOXA股价的5-7%）。

本年度基本面依然强劲
我们认为，得益于世界杯赛事带来的广告收入增长、中期选举政治广告周期，以及Tubi业务的持续增长，福克斯将在本年度实现超出市场预期的业绩。我们对2026/2027财年EBITDA的预期较市场一致预期分别高出4%/3%。

估值
经历近期的股价下挫后，FOXA当前的2026年EBITDA估值为8.6倍，2027年EBITDA估值为8.0倍。考虑到该公司在本十年末前的EBITDA复合增速将为中低个位数，且EBITDA的70%以上可转化为自由现金流，同时凭借资产负债表的低杠杆水平（最近一个报告季度的过去十二个月杠杆率为1.3倍），公司正进行大规模股份回购（我们预计2026财年回购规模将达到23亿美元，约占当前市值的10%），我们认为当前估值极具吸引力。

我们以2027年EBITDA的9.0倍对FOXA进行估值，得出68美元的目标价（上行空间18%）。对比过去一年7.5-10.5倍的估值区间（图表2），我们认为估值区间的上限具备合理性，原因在于：1）2025年末线性视频用户下滑趋势有所缓解；2）福克斯新闻频道的会员费定价有所提升；3）Tubi业务的EBITDA增长轨迹有所改善。

我们的目标价也得到了分部估值法的支撑（图表3）。
在分部估值法中，我们还考虑了前述Flutter股份、FanDuel期权、2019年与迪士尼交易产生的税盾净现值，以及其演播室地块的价值（迪士尼将于今年终止该地块的租约）。

家得宝相对估值
沃尔玛相对估值
CVS相对估值
高盛相对估值
摩根士丹利相对估值
卡特彼勒相对估值
约翰迪尔相对估值
希尔顿相对估值
百胜中国相对估值
联邦快递相对估值

风险因素：
1. NFL相关负面报道：流媒体平台对赛事版权的兴趣传闻或版权费用上调的猜测，可能进一步加剧福克斯股价的下行波动。
2. 事件路径高度不确定：任何明确事件的时间线（版权续约及后续运营商提价）均存在高度不确定性。与不同合作方的版权续约可能分批进行，也可能同步完成。市场担忧情绪何时得以缓解的能见度极低。