five

A randomized, open-label clinical trial comparing the long-term effects of miltefosine and meglumine antimoniate for mucosal leishmaniasis

收藏
DataCite Commons2020-08-27 更新2024-07-27 收录
下载链接:
https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/A_randomized_open-label_clinical_trial_comparing_the_long-term_effects_of_miltefosine_and_meglumine_antimoniate_for_mucosal_leishmaniasis/7942331/1
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
Abstract INTRODUCTION: The treatment of mucosal leishmaniasis (ML) is difficult due to the toxicity and route of administration of standard drugs. Miltefosine is an oral agent used for leishmaniasis treatment; however, no data exist regarding its use for ML in Brazil. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of miltefosine for ML treatment compared to that of pentavalent antimonial in a pilot study. METHODS: We performed a randomized clinical trial with two parallel groups. The tested intervention consisted of miltefosine 1.3-2 mg/kg/day (two capsules) for 28 days or intravenous 20 mg SbV/kg/day of meglumine antimoniate (N-MA) for 30 days. The final endpoint was defined as complete healing of the lesion four years after treatment. We also analyzed an early endpoint at 90 days after treatment. RESULTS: Forty patients were included in this study: each experimental group comprised 20 patients. Applying a multivariate model in an intention-to-treat analysis, we observed that patients treated with miltefosine had a cure probability 2.08 times greater (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-4.18) than those treated with N-MA at 90 days after treatment. At the final endpoint, we observed no differences in cure probability between miltefosine and N-MA (relative risk = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.33-1.32). With respect to adverse reactions, significant differences between groups were related to gastrointestinal effects, which were more frequent in the miltefosine group. CONCLUSIONS: Miltefosine may be an interesting alternative for treating ML because of its oral administration and cure rate after long-term follow-up.

摘要 引言:鉴于传统一线抗利什曼病药物的毒性与给药途径限制,黏膜利什曼病(mucosal leishmaniasis, ML)的临床治疗难度较高。米替福新(miltefosine)是一款用于利什曼病治疗的口服制剂,但目前巴西地区尚无其应用于ML治疗的相关研究数据。本研究作为一项先导临床试验,旨在对比米替福新与五价锑剂(pentavalent antimonial)治疗ML的临床疗效。 方法:本研究采用随机平行分组临床试验设计。试验组给予米替福新1.3~2 mg/kg/日(两粒胶囊),疗程28天;对照组给予葡甲胺锑酸盐(meglumine antimoniate, N-MA)静脉输注,以五价锑(SbV)计剂量为20 mg/kg/日,疗程30天。本研究设置双重疗效终点:最终终点为治疗4年后病灶完全愈合;早期终点为治疗后90天时的病灶愈合情况。 结果:本研究共纳入40例患者,两组各20例。经意向治疗分析(intention-to-treat analysis)结合多变量模型测算,治疗后90天时,米替福新组患者的治愈概率较N-MA组高2.08倍(95%置信区间(confidence interval, CI)=1.03~4.18)。在最终终点的分析中,两组患者的治愈概率无显著统计学差异(相对风险(relative risk)=0.66;95%CI=0.33~1.32)。不良反应方面,两组间差异主要集中于胃肠道反应,该类不良反应在米替福新组中发生率更高。 结论:米替福新具备口服给药的便捷性优势,且长期随访结果显示其临床治愈率可观,有望成为ML治疗的潜在替代方案。
提供机构:
SciELO journals
创建时间:
2019-04-03
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务