Strategic analysis of the formulation process of SUS National Policy on Monitoring and Evaluation (PNM&A-SUS): challenges and lessons learned

ABSTRACT This article presents the Strategic Analysis (AE) of the formulation process of SUS National Policy on Monitoring and Evaluation (PNM&A-SUS). The study employed a qualitative document analysis and literature review, accounting for the three dimensions of AE: relevance of the problem (needed institutional policy); proposed objectives and mobilized partnerships. The analysis showed a discontinuous formulation process with relevant controversies regarding evaluation purposes, assumptions, responsibilities and expected competencies among stakeholders. The interrupted formulation process needs to be recommenced, as for the lessons learned and the realistic context assessment.

摘要
本文针对SUS国家监测与评价政策（PNM&A-SUS）的制定流程开展战略分析（Strategic Analysis，AE）。本研究采用质性文件分析与文献综述法，围绕该战略分析的三大维度展开：问题关联性（即所需的制度化政策）、拟定目标与动员的伙伴关系。分析结果表明，该制定过程呈现不连续性特征，且在评估目标、假设前提、责任划分及利益相关方（stakeholders）的预期权责等方面存在诸多争议。鉴于已汲取的经验教训与现实情境评估，该中断的制定流程亟需重新启动。