Cost-effectiveness of the adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccine among adults aged ≥60 years in the United States
收藏DataCite Commons2026-01-21 更新2025-01-06 收录
下载链接:
https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Cost-effectiveness_of_the_adjuvanted_RSVPreF3_vaccine_among_adults_aged_60_years_in_the_United_States/27998416/1
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a common cause of acute respiratory illness in individuals of all ages, with adults aged ≥60 years and adults with certain chronic conditions at increased risk of severe RSV-related outcomes. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of the adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccine versus no vaccine in adults aged ≥60 years in the United States (US). A multi-cohort Markov model was developed with a 5-year time horizon and 1-month cycle length to compare outcomes for no vaccination and one-time adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccination (assuming the same vaccination as for influenza vaccines). Clinical parameters (e.g., vaccine efficacy) were based on phase 3 clinical trial data over 3 seasons, with all other inputs obtained from public US sources and scientific literature. Outcomes included total and incremental quality-adjusted life year (QALY) losses and costs, as well as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the sensitivity of results to inputs. In the base case, the model estimated that vaccinating 52.7 million adults aged ≥60 years with the adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccine once would result in 244,424 fewer QALY losses and an incremental societal cost of $4.5 billion over 5 years, with vaccination costs partially offset by reduced disease-related costs. From the societal perspective, adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccination resulted in an ICER of $18,430 per QALY gained. Results were relatively robust across sensitivity analyses and indicate that adjuvanted RSVPreF3 vaccination is a cost-effective option for the prevention of RSV in US adults aged ≥ 60 years, reducing the substantial burden within this population.
呼吸道合胞病毒(Respiratory syncytial virus, RSV)是引发全年龄段人群急性呼吸道疾病的常见病原体,其中60岁及以上成人以及患有特定慢性疾病的个体,出现重症RSV相关不良结局的风险显著升高。本研究评估了佐剂化RSVPreF3疫苗与不接种疫苗方案,针对美国60岁及以上成人的成本效果。本研究构建了时间跨度为5年、周期时长为1个月的多队列马尔可夫(Markov)模型,对比不接种疫苗与一次性接种佐剂化RSVPreF3疫苗的结局(假设接种流程与流感疫苗一致)。临床参数(如疫苗效力)基于覆盖3个流行季的3期临床试验数据,其余所有输入参数均取自美国公开数据源与科学文献。研究结局包括总质量调整生命年(quality-adjusted life year, QALY)损失、增量QALY损失与总成本,以及增量成本效果比(incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, ICERs)。本研究开展敏感性分析,以评估研究结果对输入参数的稳健性。在基线场景中,模型估算显示,为5270万60岁及以上成人接种一剂佐剂化RSVPreF3疫苗,可在5年内减少244424个QALY损失,同时产生45亿美元的增量社会成本,疫苗接种成本可通过降低疾病相关支出得到部分抵消。从社会视角来看,佐剂化RSVPreF3疫苗接种每获得1个QALY的增量成本效果比为18430美元。敏感性分析结果显示该结论具有较好的稳健性,表明佐剂化RSVPreF3疫苗接种是美国60岁及以上成人预防RSV感染的具有成本效果的方案,可有效减轻该人群所面临的沉重疾病负担。
提供机构:
Taylor & Francis
创建时间:
2024-12-10



