Pedagogy of Success: Perception in Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students at a Peruvian University
收藏NIAID Data Ecosystem2026-03-12 收录
下载链接:
https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/UZKGBI
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
The objective of the study was to compare whether there are differences in the perception of undergraduate and postgraduate university students about the pedagogy of success. The study is of a non-experimental type with a comparative descriptive design. To collect the information, a survey was applied as a technique; to a sample of fifty university students. As a method, the hypothetical deductive was applied. To obtain information on the variable, the Perception of Pedagogy of Success questionnaire was administered with a total of 23 items based on three dimensions: Opportunity to learn (9 items), Feedback (8 items) and Consideration of the person (6 items), with the following qualitative value scale: Always, Sometimes and Never; the quantitative value scale was from two to zero. To find the validity of the instrument, it was subjected to expert judgment, calculating the content validity ratio for each item and taking into account the criteria of clarity, belonging and relevance. Calculation of reliability with Cronbach's alpha (0.887). For the application of the questionnaire, given the current pandemic situation, Google Forms was used, obtaining fast, timely and reliable responses. The data were processed through the SPSS V. 25. Conclusions: the results of the study indicate that the pedagogical support of the postgraduate teacher is superior to that of the undergraduate, however, the undergraduate teacher stands out in their ability to listen and empathy towards the learner. Finally, the application of the Pedagogy of Success is more promoted to postgraduate students.
本研究旨在比较本科与研究生大学生对成功教学法(Pedagogy of Success)的感知差异。本研究属于非实验性研究,采用比较描述性研究设计。信息收集环节采用问卷调查法作为数据收集手段,调研样本为50名高校学生。研究方法上,采用假设演绎法开展研究。为获取目标变量的感知数据,本研究使用成功教学法感知问卷,该问卷共包含23个条目,涵盖3个维度:学习机会(9个条目)、反馈(8个条目)与个体关怀(6个条目),配套的定性评分量表为"始终"、"有时"、"从不",对应定量评分量表分值区间为2至0。为验证该调研工具的效度,本研究采用专家评判法,计算各条目的内容效度比,并依据清晰性、适配性与相关性三项标准开展评估。信度计算采用克朗巴赫α系数(Cronbach's alpha),最终得分为0.887。鉴于当前疫情形势,本研究通过谷歌表单(Google Forms)发放问卷,可快速、及时且可靠地获取调研数据。所有数据均通过SPSS V.25统计软件进行处理。研究结论显示:研究生导师的教学支持水平优于本科导师,但本科导师在倾听学习者与共情方面表现更为突出;成功教学法在研究生群体中的推广程度更高。
创建时间:
2021-08-10



