Supplementary material for Prophetic AI: A Tawhidic Quadripartite Framework for The Digital Literacy of The KHALIFAH In Multicultural Islamic Education

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS FOR "PROPHETIC AI: A TAWHIDIC QUADRIPARTITE FRAMEWORK FOR THE DIGITAL LITERACY OF THE KHALIFAH IN MULTICULTURAL ISLAMIC EDUCATION" GENERAL INFORMATION Field Details Title Supplementary Materials: Prophetic AI Framework - Systematic Qualitative Evidence Synthesis Data and Coding Documentation Authors [Author Name], [Co-Author Name] Publication Date 2026 Version 1.0 Language English Related Publication Prophetic AI: A Tawhidic Quadripartite Framework for The Digital Literacy of The KHALIFAH In Multicultural Islamic Education DOI [To be assigned upon publication] ABSTRACT This supplementary material accompanies the article "Prophetic AI: A Tawhidic Quadripartite Framework for The Digital Literacy of The KHALIFAH In Multicultural Islamic Education" and provides comprehensive documentation of the systematic qualitative evidence synthesis methodology, including the complete dataset of 122 included studies, quality appraisal results, coding frameworks, intercoder reliability assessments, thematic analyses, CIMO logic extraction tables, and tension-solution mapping. The materials are organized to ensure full transparency and replicability of the synthesis process, enabling independent verification of the framework construction. FILE DESCRIPTION File Name: Supplementary.pdf Description: This document contains seven (7) main tables (S1–S7) documenting the systematic qualitative evidence synthesis that underpins the Prophetic AI Framework development. TABLE OF CONTENTS Table Title Description S1 Study Passing Quality Test and Saturation Justification Quality appraisal scores (JBI/MMAT) for all 122 included studies, saturation justification across 11 analytical batches, and detailed quality appraisal checklists by study type S2 List of Included Studies with PICo Framework Complete list of 122 included studies with study ID, author, year, main text usage, and PICo (Population-Interest-Context) characteristics S3 Intercoder Reliability and Codebook Cohen's Kappa tests for two coders, disagreement resolution deliberations, and sample codebook with 20 codes from the cyber-hermeneutic thematic analysis S4 Study Characteristics Table Comprehensive study characteristics including purpose, method, sample/source, and main focus for all 122 included studies S5 Thematic Analysis - Cyber-Hermeneutics Approach Master themes and sub-themes with representative sources and cyber-hermeneutic interpretation across four thematic domains S6 CIMO Analysis Table Complete CIMO (Context-Intervention-Mechanism-Outcome) framework extraction for all 122 studies S7 Tension & Solution Table Dialectical tensions identified across four domains with conceptual solutions from the Prophetic AI Framework DETAILED TABLE DESCRIPTIONS Table S1. Study Passing Quality Test and Saturation Justification Section Content S1.1 Study Passing Quality Test: 122 studies with design, test instrument, score, RQ assignment, and status S1.2 Key Findings for Saturation Justification: Per-RQ evidence counts and saturation status S1.3 Saturation Justification: Criteria including thematic saturation, framework stabilization, cross-batch replication, geographic and methodological diversity S1.4 Quality Appraisal for Systematic & Literature Reviews (JBI Checklist, 11 criteria) S1.5 Quality Appraisal for Qualitative Studies (MMAT Qualitative, 5 criteria) S1.6 Quality Appraisal for Quantitative Studies (MMAT Survey, 5 criteria) S1.7 Quality Appraisal for Mixed-Methods Studies (MMAT Mixed, 10 criteria) S1.8 Quality Appraisal for Conceptual/Theoretical Papers (JBI Adaptation, 8 criteria) S1.9 Summary: Quality Appraisal Distribution Key Metrics: · Total studies passing quality threshold: 122 · Intercoder agreement (screening): 89.5%, Cohen's Kappa κ = 0.84 · Saturation achieved: No new codes emerged after Wave 3 · Quality thresholds: JBI ≥ 8/11 or MMAT ≥ 80% Table S2. List of Included Studies with PICo Framework Section Content S2.1 List of 122 Included Studies with Main Text Usage Indicator S2.2 Summary: Studies used in main text vs. supplementary only S2.3 PICo (Population-Interest-Context) Framework for all 122 studies Key Information: · Total included studies: 122 · Studies used in main text: 72 (59.0%) · Studies supplementary only: 50 (41.0%) Table S3. Intercoder Reliability and Codebook Section Content S3.1 Kappa Test for Two Coders: Coding decisions with deliberation status S3.2 Inter-Coder Disagreements & Deliberation Resolution S3.3 Summary of Deliberation Outcomes S3.4 Key Insights from Deliberation S3.5 Coding Book (Codebook) - Sample of 20 Studies S3.6 Codebook Categories Summary S3.7 Inter-Coder Agreement by Code Category Key Metrics: · Initial agreement (thematic coding): 89.8% · Cohen's Kappa (thematic coding): κ = 0.85 (95% CI: 0.81–0.89) · Category-specific Kappa: Epistemological Bias (0.87), Decolonization & Reconstruction (0.83), Axiological Foundations (0.88), KDL Outcomes (0.82) · Deliberated studies: 20 (16.4% of corpus) Table S4. Study Characteristics Table Comprehensive characteristics for all 122 included studies: Column Description ID Unique study identifier (1-122) Study Author(s) and year Main Purpose Primary research objective Method Study design and methodology Sample/Source Participants, corpus, or data source Main Focus Primary thematic contribution Table S5. Thematic Analysis - Cyber-Hermeneutics Approach Master Theme Sub-Themes Representative Sources Cyber-Hermeneutic Interpretation RQ Relevance 1. Epistemic Hegemony & Algorithmic Bias a) Western-centric data colonialism; b) Deficit framing & erasure; c) Infrastructural divides 38 studies Pre-understanding → Understanding → Explanation → Application RQ1 2. Decolonization, Reconstruction & Local Epistemology a) Indigenous epistemologies; b) Integration of Bayani-Burhani-Irfani; c) Culturally responsive pedagogies 30 studies AI as text to be reread through local/communal lenses RQ2 3. Digital Justice, Access & Participation a) Disability inclusion & UDL; b) Refugee education & forced displacement; c) Gender expansiveness & neurodiversity 31 studies Digital justice = access + agency + representation RQ3 4. Ethics, Agency & Future of Education a) Responsible HCAI; b) GenAI paradox; c) AI literacy & future scenarios 13 studies Ethics as moral infrastructure, not external rules RQ1, RQ2, RQ3 Table S6. CIMO Analysis Table Complete CIMO framework extraction for all 122 studies: Column Description ID Unique study identifier Study Author(s) and year Context (C) Problematic situation or setting Intervention (I) Proposed solution or framework Mechanism (M) Transformative process or causal logic Outcome (O) Expected or observed results Table S7. Tension & Solution Table Domain Tension Primary Study Sources Conceptual Solution I. Epistemic & Cultural Western-centric AI vs. Indigenous/Local Epistemology; Algorithmic Dogmatism vs. Algorithmic Plural Hermeneutics; Epistemic Injustice vs. Testimonial Justice 39 studies (34.8%) Bayani (Data Decolonization); Burhani (Audit & Critical Rationality); Irfani (Transcendental Censorship) II. Social & Access Digital Divide vs. Holistic Digital Justice; Disability Erasure vs. Inclusive Design; Gender/Cisnormativity vs. Gender Expansive Education 37 studies (33.0%) Maslahah Mursalah (Public Welfare-Based Policy); Morals (Ethical & Universal Design); Multiculturalism (Responsive Pedagogy) III. Pedagogical & Ethical AI Efficiency vs. Moral Agency & Wellbeing; Deficit vs. Asset-Based Framing; GenAI Paradox (Opportunity/Risk) 35 studies (31.3%) Moral Infrastructure; Irfani + Multiculturalism; Burhani + Akhlak IV. Technical-Operational Techno-Solutionism vs. Critical Digital Pedagogy; Religious Text Reductionism vs. Hermeneutical Richness; Algorithmic Bias vs. Culturally Responsive AI 40 studies (35.7%) Burhani + Akhlak + Multiculturalism; Bayani + Irfani; Multiculturalism + Bayani KEY METHODOLOGICAL INFORMATION Aspect Details Synthesis Type Systematic Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (SQES) Search Period 2015–2025 Databases Scopus, Web of Science, JSTOR, IEEE Xplore, ERIC, Google Scholar Initial Records 1,247 Included Studies 122 (8.1% inclusion rate) Analysis Frameworks PICo, CIMO, Cyber-Hermeneutics Coding Software NVivo 14 (QSR International) Quality Appraisal JBI Checklist, MMAT Intercoder Reliability κ = 0.84 (screening); κ = 0.85 (thematic coding)