Data and statistical codes for: Reliability of urological telesurgery compared to local surgery: A multicenter, randomised controlled trial

This multicenter, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial investigated whether telesurgery is as reliable as standard local surgery for patients undergoing urological robotic operations, using a prespecified non-inferiority margin of a 0.1 absolute reduction in surgical success probability. Conducted at five hospitals in China from December to June, the study enrolled patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy or partial nephrectomy and randomly assigned them 1:1 to telesurgery or local surgery. The primary outcome was surgical success probability, assessed by the medical team based on predefined criteria, alongside 13 clinical secondary outcomes related to the operation and early recovery, one secondary outcome assessing medical team workload, and four technical secondary outcomes evaluating network latency, display latency, frame loss, and system malfunction; participants were followed at 4 and 6 weeks postoperatively. A total of 72 participants were included in the intention-to..., , # Data and statistical codes for: Reliability of urological telesurgery compared to local surgery: A multicenter, randomised controlled trial

Dataset DOI: [10.5061/dryad.t4b8gtjg8](https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.t4b8gtjg8)

## Description of the data and file structure

In this randomized controlled trial, 72 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the telesurgery group or the local surgery group, constituting the intention-to-treat set. The dataset comprises the following elements:

(1) Clinical and demographic data of all patients, including age, sex, height, weight, and tumor characteristics;

(2) Scores from all administered scales at the 4-week and 6-week follow-up assessments, including the QoR-15, 30-Second Chair-to-Stand Test, EPIC-26, and NASA-TLX;

(3) Telesurgery system monitoring data, encompassing round-trip latency, frame loss, and display latency for all procedures;

(4) All statistical analysis codes.

### Files and variables

* Clinical..., This trial has received explicit consent from your participants to publish the de-identified data in the public domain. We are committed to preserving the anonymity and confidentiality of the study participants and their behaviors. We are also committed to the reproducibility of scientific results, and to offering other scholars the ability to advance science using the data we collected as part of this study. 

本项多中心非劣效性随机对照试验（randomized controlled trial）旨在探究，针对接受泌尿外科机器人手术（urological robotic operations）的患者，远程手术（telesurgery）是否与标准局部手术具有同等可靠性，本研究预设的非劣效界值为手术成功概率绝对降低0.1。本研究于中国5家医院开展，开展周期为12月至6月，纳入计划行根治性前列腺切除术（radical prostatectomy）或肾部分切除术（partial nephrectomy）的患者，并以1:1比例随机分配至远程手术组与局部手术组。主要结局指标为手术成功概率，由医疗团队基于预设标准进行评估；本研究同时设置13项与手术及早期康复相关的临床次要结局指标、1项评估医疗团队工作量的次要结局指标，以及4项评估网络延迟（network latency）、显示延迟（display latency）、丢帧（frame loss）与系统故障（system malfunction）的技术类次要结局指标；受试者于术后4周和6周接受随访。最终共纳入72例受试者进入意向性（intention-to-treat）分析集……
# 数据与统计代码来源：《泌尿外科远程手术与局部手术的可靠性对比：一项多中心随机对照试验》
数据集DOI：[10.5061/dryad.t4b8gtjg8](https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.t4b8gtjg8)

## 数据与文件结构说明
本随机对照试验共纳入72例受试者，以1:1比例随机分配至远程手术组与局部手术组，构成意向性治疗（intention-to-treat）集。本数据集包含以下内容：
(1) 所有患者的临床与人口学数据，包括年龄、性别、身高、体重及肿瘤特征；
(2) 4周与6周随访评估中所有施用量表的得分，包括QoR-15、30秒坐站测试（30-Second Chair-to-Stand Test）、EPIC-26与NASA-TLX；
(3) 远程手术系统监测数据，涵盖所有手术操作的往返延迟（round-trip latency）、丢帧与显示延迟；
(4) 所有统计分析代码。

### 文件与变量
* 临床…… 本试验已获得受试者明确知情同意，允许将去标识化（de-identified data）数据公开发布。本团队致力于保护研究受试者的匿名性与信息保密性，同时保障研究结果可复现，并为其他学者提供利用本研究收集的数据推动科学进步的途径。