Eurobarometer 38.0 (Sep-Oct 1992)

1. General Indicators;

2. Attitude to the EC;

3. Attitude to abortion;

4. Smoking habits;

5. Product safety.

Topics: 1. General Indicators: citizenship and eligibility to vote at
place of residence; contentment with life; satisfaction with democracy;
opinion leadership and frequency of political discussions;
postmaterialism; frequency of obtaining news from television, radio and
newspapers.

2. Attitude to the EC: knowledge about the EC and its institutions;
hopes and fears for the future of the European Community; judgement on
personal level of information about the EC; attitude to European
unification and membership of one´s own country in the EC; advantages
or disadvantages for the country from EC membership; regret of a
possible failure of the EC; general assessment of the significance of
the EC; attitude to a European Government and European Parliament;
judgement on the possibilities for citizens to democratically influence
EC decisions; preferred new EC member countries until the year 2000;
significance of European unification for national or European identity
of the individual; judgement on the EC Commission by means of a
semantic differential; preference for national or European
decision-making authority in selected political areas; knowledge about
the start of the European domestic market; expectations of the European
domestic market and reasons for hopes and fears; general attitude to
the domestic market and to a European social policy; general
significance of the European Parliament in selected political areas;
attitude to an increasing significance of the parliament; agreement
with an expanded transfer of authority to the EC in an economic and
currency union as well as in a political unification; knowledge about
the Maastricht conference, its resolutions and their contents;
agreement or rejection of the Maastricht Treaty as well as selected
components of the treaty; expected effects of the Maastricht Treaty for
the EC, for one´s own country and for personal life; exchange of
national identity for a European identity; chances of individual EC
countries to join the economic and currency union; expected advantages
or disadvantages for one´s own country from the economic and currency
union; preference for European or national precedents in conflicts of
laws; sense of justice and attitude to selected aspects of the legal
system (scale); attitude to the European Court of Justice and the
highest national court of law; judgement on the work of the highest
European Court of Justice.

3. Attitude to abortion: attitude to the right to abortion and a
European regulation regarding abortion.

4. Smoking habits: number of cigarettes smoked daily; desire to quit
smoking or reduce use of cigarettes (split: in the second case the
question was not about desire but intent); frequency of not smoking in
order not to bother others present; reasonableness for a smoker to
travel in the no-smoking compartment or vice versa for a non-smoker to
travel in the smoking compartment; time of quitting smoking (for former
smokers); presence of smokers at home, in one´s circle of friends, at
work and at other places; frequency of requests to smokers not to
smoke; perceived bother from smokers; frequency of personal passive
smoking; assessment of jeopardy to health from passive smoking;
attitude to a smoking ban in public institutions; extent of such a
smoking prohibition in one´s own vicinity; perceived observance of the
smoking ban; preference for smoking zones or no-smoking zones at work;
preference for an independent solution among work colleagues or for a
management decision; smoking regulations at one´s place of work and
perceived observance of these rules; attitude to a prohibition of
cigarette advertising; knowledge about prohibitions of advertising for
cigarettes in one´s country; evaluation of the effectiveness of these
prohibitions; knowledge about the European program to combat cancer.

5. Product safety: most important criteria in purchase of products;
interest in the safety of products and services; significance of the
security aspect of products in the media, in school and in leisure
time; assessment of the salience of consumer protection (scale);
consumer areas in which one should place particular value on safety;
consumer areas to which one attributes the greatest potential for
jeopardy; those primarily responsible for product safety and the safety
of services in selected product areas; expected comparability of
security standard of products in Europe and desire for generally
understandable safety codes; the same security standards in Europe;
desire for cross-border signs and symbols for dangers at the beach, in
the mountains and with fire; adequate extent to which citizens are
informed about dangers to the environment; assessment of the usefulness
of selected types of insurance; greatest sources of danger for older
people and children in different age-groups; last accident at home in
one´s family; person who had an accident; product or object which lead
to the accident; one responsible for the accident.

Demography: self-classification on a left-right continuum; party
allegiance; party preference (Sunday question); behavior at the polls
in the last election; union membership; marital status; age at end of
education; resumption of school training after an interruption and
length of school training; length of further education; sex; age; size
of household; number of children in household; possession of durable
economic goods; occupational position; weekly number of working hours;
supervisor status; employment in the civil service or private
enterprise (company sector); person managing household; position in
household; age of head of household at end of education; occupation of
head of household; supervisor status of head of household;
self-assessment of social class; residential status; degree of
urbanization; religious denomination; frequency of church attendance;
religiousness; monthly household income; city size; region; possession
of a telephone.

Indices: opinion leadership (cognitive mobility); postmaterialism;
attitude to Europe; status in profession; party preference on European
level; EC support; support for the EC domestic market; media usage;
ESOMAR Social Grade; life cycle.

In the Federal Republic the following questions were also posed: use
of selected sources of information about the EC; perceived EC topics;
preferred sources of information about the European Community;
assessment of the EC role in achieving equivalent standard of living
between Eastern and Western Germany.

In Great Britain and Northern Ireland the following question was also
posed: knowledge and significance of the British EC presidency.

In France, West Germany, United Kingdom, Spain and Italy the following
questions were also posed: self-classification of knowledge about
selected EC countries; naming the most pleasant, most conscientious,
most efficient and most trustworthy EC countries; assessment of the
achievablilty of conditions for joining the economic and currency union
by one´s own country.

Only in Italy the following questions were posed: assumed interest of
new applicant countries in EC membership; attitude to a subordinate
role of one´s own country in an economic and currency union; most
important obstacles to participation in the economic and currency
union; perceived readiness of the population for economic and social
sacrifices for the benefit of an economic and currency union; judgement
on selected economic and social disadvantages for Italy from the
economic and currency union; willingness to sacrifice income for the
benefit of European unification.

In Denmark the following questions were also posed: knowledge about
the monthly magazine ´ES-AVISSEN´ and its content; origin of the issues
read; evaluation of information content in selected areas; preference
for more frequent publication of this magazine.

The following questions were posed only in Norway: highest school
degree; further education and college attendance.

Also encoded was: date of interview; length of interview; willingness
of respondent to cooperate; number of contact attempts; identification
of interviewer.

1. 通用指标（General Indicators）；
2. 对欧洲共同体（European Community，简称EC）的态度；
3. 对堕胎的态度；
4. 吸烟习惯；
5. 产品安全。

调研主题：
1. 通用指标：涵盖公民身份与居住地选举权资格、生活满意度、民主满意度、意见领袖特质与政治讨论频率、后物质主义、通过电视、广播与报纸获取新闻的频率。
2. 对EC的态度：包含对EC及其机构的认知、对欧洲共同体未来的期许与担忧、个人对EC相关信息的了解程度评估、对欧洲统一以及本国加入EC的态度、本国加入EC的利弊分析、对EC可能失败的遗憾情绪、对EC重要性的整体评价、对欧洲政府与欧洲议会的态度、对公民民主参与EC决策的可能性评估、2000年前偏好的新EC成员国、欧洲统一对个人国家身份或欧洲身份的意义、通过语义差异法（semantic differential）对EC委员会的评价、在特定政治领域偏好国家还是欧洲决策权限、对欧洲内部市场启动的认知、对欧洲内部市场的期许与担忧的成因、对内部市场与欧洲社会政策的整体态度、欧洲议会在特定政治领域的整体重要性、对议会职权扩张的态度、对向EC让渡经济与货币联盟乃至政治统一权限的支持情况、对马斯特里赫特会议及其决议与内容的认知、对《马斯特里赫特条约》（Maastricht Treaty）及其特定条款的支持或反对态度、《马斯特里赫特条约》对EC、本国以及个人生活的预期影响、以欧洲身份置换国家身份、单个EC成员国加入经济与货币联盟的可能性、本国从经济与货币联盟中预期获得的利弊、在法律冲突中偏好欧洲还是国内先例、正义感与对法律体系特定方面的态度（量表形式）、对欧洲法院（European Court of Justice）与本国最高法院的态度、对欧洲最高法院工作的评价。
3. 对堕胎的态度：对堕胎权以及欧洲堕胎监管政策的态度。
4. 吸烟习惯：每日吸烟量、戒烟或减少吸烟量的意愿（注：第二种情况中，问题聚焦于意图而非单纯意愿）、为避免打扰在场他人而不吸烟的频率、吸烟者使用无烟车厢（或非吸烟者使用吸烟车厢）的合理性评估、戒烟时间（针对既往吸烟者）、家庭、朋友圈、工作场所及其他场所的吸烟人群存在情况、向吸烟者提出禁烟请求的频率、感受到的吸烟者带来的困扰、个人被动吸烟的频率、对被动吸烟健康危害的评估、对公共机构禁烟令的态度、个人周边禁烟令的实施范围、对禁烟令执行情况的感知、工作场所偏好吸烟区还是无烟区、偏好同事自主制定还是管理层决策禁烟规则、工作场所的吸烟规定与对其执行情况的感知、对香烟广告禁令的态度、对本国香烟广告禁令的认知、对这些禁令有效性的评价、对欧洲抗癌项目的认知。
5. 产品安全：产品购买时最看重的标准、对产品与服务安全的关注度、产品安全属性在媒体、学校与休闲场景中的受重视程度、对消费者保护重要性的评估（量表形式）、需特别关注安全的消费领域、被认为风险潜力最大的消费领域、特定产品领域中产品与服务安全的主要责任方、欧洲产品安全标准的预期可比性、对通用易懂的安全规范的诉求、欧洲统一的安全标准、对海滩、山地与火灾相关危险的跨境警示标识的诉求、公民对环境危险的知情程度是否充足、对特定保险类型实用性的评估、不同年龄组中老年人与儿童面临的最大危险源、家庭中最近发生的意外事故、事故涉事人员、导致事故的产品或物品、事故责任方。

人口统计学变量：左右谱系自我归类、党派归属、党派偏好（周日调查问题）、上次选举投票行为、工会会员身份、婚姻状况、教育结束时的年龄、中断学业后重返培训的情况与培训时长、继续教育时长、性别、年龄、家庭规模、家庭子女数量、耐用消费品拥有情况、职业职位、周工作时长、管理岗身份、公职或私营企业就业（企业部门）、家庭管理者、在家庭中的地位、户主教育结束时的年龄、户主职业、户主管理岗身份、社会阶层自我评估、居住身份、城市化程度、宗教教派、教堂出席频率、宗教虔诚度、家庭月收入、城市规模、所属地区、电话拥有情况。

指数类变量：意见领袖（认知流动性）、后物质主义、对欧洲的态度、职业地位、欧洲层面党派偏好、EC支持率、对EC内部市场的支持度、媒体使用情况、欧洲民意与市场研究协会（ESOMAR）社会等级、生命周期。

在联邦德国（原西德）中，还增设了以下调研问题：欧洲共同体相关信息的特定信息来源使用情况、感知到的EC议题、偏好的欧洲共同体信息来源、对EC在缩小东西德生活水平差距方面作用的评估。

在英国与北爱尔兰中，还增设了以下调研问题：对英国EC轮值主席国的认知与意义评价。

在法国、原西德、英国、西班牙与意大利中，还增设了以下调研问题：对特定EC成员国的了解程度自我归类、命名最具亲和力、最尽责、最高效与最值得信赖的EC成员国、对本国加入经济与货币联盟所需条件的可达性评估。

仅在意大利增设了以下调研问题：新申请国对EC成员国资格的预期兴趣、对本国在经济与货币联盟中处于从属地位的态度、本国参与经济与货币联盟的主要障碍、民众为经济与货币联盟做出经济与社会牺牲的意愿感知、对意大利从经济与货币联盟中面临的特定经济与社会弊端的评价、为欧洲统一牺牲收入的意愿。

在丹麦增设了以下调研问题：对月刊《ES-AVISSEN》及其内容的认知、阅读刊物的来源渠道、对特定领域信息内容的评价、对该刊物更频繁出版的偏好。

仅在挪威增设了以下调研问题：最高学历、继续教育与大学就读情况。

同时还编码了以下元数据：访谈日期、访谈时长、受访者合作意愿、联络尝试次数、访员身份标识。