Supporting data for "IMPROVING PROCEDURAL JUSTICE IN ANTI-DUMPING INVESTIGATIONS: LESSONS FROM THE U.S AND EU PRACTICES AGAINST CHINA"

This research focuses on the procedural rules of the U.S. and EU, key instigators of anti-dumping measures, against China. This study assumes that the anti-dumping investigations are directed in such a way that exporters are discouraged to cooperate with the investigating authorities so that overprotective anti-dumping duties can be adopted. The study primarily relies on fieldwork and accordingly surveys were devoted to the public authorities, WTO law firms and companies that experienced at least one anti-dumping investigation. The dataset includes the surveys designed for WTO lawyers, Chinese exporters and government agencies. The dataset also includes the contact information of the possible participants. The dataset covers responses collected through empirical research as well as other findings to support the hypothesis of this study. Dataset also includes the data management plan and the ethical approval by the HREC.

本研究聚焦于作为反倾销措施核心发起方的美国与欧盟针对中国的反倾销程序性规则。本研究提出假说：反倾销调查的推进方式会抑制出口商与调查当局开展合作，进而得以采取过度保护性的反倾销关税措施。本研究主要依托实地调研方法开展，据此面向曾至少经历过一次反倾销调查的公共机构、世界贸易组织（WTO）律所及企业进行了调研。本数据集包含针对WTO律师、中国出口商及政府机构设计的调查问卷，同时涵盖潜在参与者的联系方式。数据集收录了通过实证研究收集的调研回复，以及用于支撑本研究假说的各类其他研究发现。此外，数据集还包含数据管理计划以及由人类研究伦理审查委员会（HREC）出具的伦理批准文件。