Performance (in millions of cells per second) of the various Smith-Waterman implementations, including a regular implementation (not vectorized), Wozniak's diagonal implementation with memory lookups, Farrar's method and our diagonal approach without score lookups.
收藏NIAID Data Ecosystem2026-03-07 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Performance_in_millions_of_cells_per_second_of_the_various_Smith_Waterman_implementations_including_a_regular_implementation_not_vectorized_Wozniak_s_diagonal_implementation_with_memory_lookups_Farrar_s_method_and_our_diagonal_approach_without_score_look/567964
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
We inserted each into SHRiMP, and used SHRiMP to align 50 thousand reads to a reference genome with default parameters. The improvements of the Core 2 architecture for vectored instructions lead to a significant speedup for our approach and Farrar's, while Wozniak's algorithm slight improvement is due to the slow match/mismatch lookups.
我们将每条序列读段(reads)导入SHRiMP工具,并以默认参数借助SHRiMP将50,000条序列读段与参考基因组进行序列比对。酷睿2(Core 2)架构针对向量指令的优化,为本研究方法与法拉尔算法(Farrar's algorithm)带来了显著的运算提速;而沃兹尼亚克算法(Wozniak's algorithm)仅实现小幅提速,其原因在于该算法的匹配/错配查找操作效率偏低。
创建时间:
2013-02-21



