Table S1 - Frontal Non-Invasive Neurostimulation Modulates Antisaccade Preparation in Non-Human Primates

Mean ipsilateral or contralateral AS latency (in ms) and standard error of the mean for each of the two monkeys tested (‘Y’ and ‘C’), under active or sham TMS at each of the 3 TMS intensity levels (low, 30%, medium 40%, and high 50%) and target onset timing (100 or 150 ms) of our study. Data for the corresponding no-TMS blocks carried out at each session (#1, #2 and #3) is also displayed. Session #2 data for 100 ms SOA and medium TMS intensity for monkey C is missing because of a technical problem during the recording session. Statistically significant values * pFigure 5 for a representation of the AS latency modulation data normalized by the effects of Sham TMS or active TMS in a control location. (PDF)本研究针对两只受试猴子（编号Y与C），统计了其在主动经颅磁刺激（active Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, active TMS）与假经颅磁刺激（sham Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, sham TMS）条件下，3种经颅磁刺激强度等级（低强度30%、中强度40%、高强度50%）以及两种靶刺激起始时间（100 ms与150 ms）对应的同侧与对侧AS潜伏期（单位：毫秒）的平均值及其标准误。同时还展示了每轮实验（#1、#2、#3）中无TMS区块的对应实验数据。猴子C在100 ms刺激呈现异步间隔（Stimulus Onset Asynchrony, SOA）且中强度TMS条件下的#2轮实验数据，因记录过程中出现技术故障而缺失。具有统计学显著性的数值以*标记（p < 0.05）；图5展示了以对照脑区的假TMS或主动TMS效应归一化后的AS潜伏期调控数据。（PDF格式）