Recall Bias Analysis: Interactions between Health Indicators and Objective Childhood Neighborhood Measures Predicting Subjective Childhood Neighborhood Context; LIFE Study.
收藏Figshare2015-12-03 更新2026-04-29 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Recall_Bias_Analysis_Interactions_between_Health_Indicators_and_Objective_Childhood_Neighborhood_Measures_Predicting_Subjective_Childhood_Neighborhood_Context_LIFE_Study_/1387269
下载链接
链接失效反馈官方服务:
资源简介:
N = 693 for most models. N = 686 for neighborhood deprivation models. Note: Childhood neighborhood operationalized as neighborhood at age 10. “Neigh” = neighborhood. Each health measure, and each objective neighborhood measure, was tested in a separate model, totaling 27 models altogether.Recall Bias Analysis: Interactions between Health Indicators and Objective Childhood Neighborhood Measures Predicting Subjective Childhood Neighborhood Context; LIFE Study.
多数模型的样本量为693,邻里剥夺(neighborhood deprivation)模型的样本量为686。
注:童年邻里环境(childhood neighborhood)以研究对象10岁时的邻里环境作为操作化定义。"Neigh"为邻里(neighborhood)的缩写。
每一项健康指标与每一项客观邻里指标均在独立模型中进行检验,总计共27个模型。
回忆偏差(recall bias)分析:预测主观童年邻里环境的健康指标与客观童年邻里测量指标间的交互作用;LIFE研究。
创建时间:
2015-12-03



