Il pretore e la lex peregrina: considerazioni su Frag. Pseudo-Dositheanum de manumissionibus 12

Examining the Fragmentum pseudodositheanum, the author inquires if and how the iura peregrinorum could be known and applied by the Roman magistrate and judge in the field of a jurisdiction exercised in Italy. A special focus is devoted to the mention of the lex peregrina expressed in the Latin version of the fragment despite the reference to the nomos Hellēnōn contained in the Greek version, through a comparison between the manuscripts Paris. Lat. 6503 and Leidensis Vossianus Gr. Q. 7.

本研究针对《伪狄奥多西残卷》（Fragmentum pseudodositheanum）展开，探讨罗马司法官与裁判官能否、以及如何在意大利境内的司法管辖权范畴内，认知并适用外邦人法（iura peregrinorum）。研究特别聚焦于：该残卷拉丁语版本中提及的《外邦人法》（lex peregrina）相关表述——尽管其希腊语版本提及了希腊人法律（nomos Hellēnōn）——相关分析通过对比巴黎拉丁文手稿6503号（Paris. Lat. 6503）与莱顿沃西乌斯希腊手稿Q.7号（Leidensis Vossianus Gr. Q. 7）完成。