<b>Delphi Technique in simulating innovative learning practices : Moderating the role of IT artefacts </b>

The responses from Round 1 were aggregated and analysed. All the experts were requested to answer the questionnaire, which was arranged on a 7-point Likert scale.The consensus level was recorded as (i) high if the quartile deviation was lower or equal to 1; (ii) medium if the quartile deviation was between 1 and 2; and (iii) no consensus if the quartile deviation was above 2. On the other hand, the importance level was considered very high when the median value was above 6 and low when the median value was 5 or below. In this research, items categorised as highly important levels and with significant consensus levels were utilised to develop innovative learning practices assessment criteria.对第一轮的回复数据进行了汇总与分析。本研究要求所有专家填写采用7级李克特（Likert）量表编制的问卷。共识水平判定规则如下：若四分位差（quartile deviation）≤1，则记为高共识；若四分位差介于1至2之间，则记为中等共识；若四分位差＞2，则记为无共识。另一方面，若得分中位数＞6，则判定为极高重要性水平；若中位数≤5，则判定为低重要性水平。本研究选取同时满足极高重要性水平与显著共识水平的条目，用于构建创新学习实践评估指标体系。