dataprosocialbehaviours.sav

<br> <b>Data Collection</b> All the participants were informed by the researchers about the aim of the study and the ones who returned signed written consent forms participated in the study. The questionnaires were administered to participants in group settings in their training facilities before training sessions. Before the data collection the participants were informed that participation in the study was voluntary and the results would be kept confidential and would only be used for research purposes. Researchers also provided information about the questionnaires and how to respond to items in each questionnaire. Self-report questionnaire responses were anonymous. The participants spent about 10-15 minutes to fill in the questionnaires. The research protocol was carried out in accordance with the principles of Helsinki Declaration. <b>Data analysis</b> Preliminary analyses explanined by Tabachnick and Fidell (2007) were carried out. These analysis involved screening for out of range values, missing value analysis, and checking normality and reliability. Later, two-step procedure for structural equation modelling which was explained by Anderson and Gerbing (1988) was followed. Firstly, measurement model was tested by confirmatory factor analysis before testing the structural model. In the analysis maximum likelihood estimation was employed (ML) in AMOS 20.0. The measurement model consisted of latent variables including autonomy, competence, relatedness, antisocial behaviour towards opponent, antisocial behaviour towards teammate, prosocial behaviour towards opponent and prosocial behaviour towards teammate. <i>χ2</i>/<i>df</i> ratio &lt; 3.00, CFI &gt; .90, and RMSEA &lt; .08 were used to evaluate the model fit. Later, structural equation modelling was used to analyse the effect of satisfaction of the basic psychological needs on prosocial and antisocial behaviors.

<b>数据收集</b> 研究人员已向所有参与者告知本研究的研究目的，签署书面知情同意书的参与者方可参与本研究。问卷以集体施测的方式，在参与者的训练场馆内、正式训练开始前发放。数据收集前，研究人员已告知参与者：本研究的参与完全自愿，研究结果将严格保密，且仅用于学术研究用途。同时，研究人员还向参与者介绍了问卷的相关信息，以及各问卷题项的作答方式。本次自我报告式问卷的作答全程匿名，参与者完成问卷约需10至15分钟。本研究的研究方案严格遵循《赫尔辛基宣言》（Declaration of Helsinki）的伦理原则实施。<b>数据分析</b> 本研究采用了塔巴克尼与菲德尔（Tabachnick & Fidell, 2007）所述的初步分析流程，具体包括：筛查超限值、缺失值分析，以及正态性与信度检验。随后，本研究遵循安德森与格宾（Anderson & Gerbing, 1988）提出的两阶段结构方程模型（Structural Equation Modelling）流程展开分析：首先在检验结构模型前，通过验证性因子分析（Confirmatory Factor Analysis）对测量模型进行检验。本次分析借助AMOS 20.0软件，采用极大似然估计法（Maximum Likelihood, ML）进行参数估计。测量模型包含以下潜变量：自主性、胜任感、归属感、针对对手的反社会行为、针对队友的反社会行为、针对对手的亲社会行为，以及针对队友的亲社会行为。本研究采用<i>χ²</i>/<i>df</i>比值<3.00、比较拟合指数（Comparative Fit Index, CFI）>0.90，以及近似误差均方根（Root Mean Square Error of Approximation, RMSEA）<0.08作为模型拟合度的评估标准。最后，本研究通过结构方程模型分析了基本心理需求满足对亲社会行为与反社会行为的影响效应。