five

Carbohydrate mouth rinse reduces rating of perceived exertion but does not affect performance and energy systems contribution during a high-intensity exercise

收藏
Figshare2017-12-01 更新2026-04-29 收录
下载链接:
https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Carbohydrate_mouth_rinse_reduces_rating_of_perceived_exertion_but_does_not_affect_performance_and_energy_systems_contribution_during_a_high-intensity_exercise/5734494
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
ABSTRACT Aim The study aimed to verify the effect of carbohydrate (CHO) mouth rinse on time to exhaustion, energy systems contribution and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) during a high-intensity exercise. Methods Fourteen men performed an incremental exercise test to determine their maximal oxygen uptake and peak power output (PPO) and two time-to-exhaustion tests at 110% of PPO. Participants rinsed their mouth with 25ml of 6.4% of CHO or placebo (PLA) solution immediately before the time-to-exhaustion test, using a crossover design. The contribution of the energy systems was calculated using the free software GEDAE-LaB®. Results Time to exhaustion was similar between the conditions (CHO:174.3±42.8s; PLA:166.7±26.3s; p=0.33). In addition, there was no difference between the CHO and PLA condition for aerobic (CHO:135.1±41.2kJ and PLA:129.8±35.3kJ, p=0.34), anaerobic lactic (CHO:57.6±17.1kJ and PLA:53.4±15.1kJ, p=0.10), and anaerobic alactic (CHO:10.4±8.4kJ and PLA:13.2±9.2kJ, p=0.37) contribution. Consequently, total energy expenditure was similar between conditions (CHO:203.2±46.4kJ and PLA:196.5±45.2kJ, p=0.15). However, CHO mouth rinse reduced the RPE at the moment of exhaustion (CHO:18.2±1.0units and PLA:19.1±1.1units; p=0.02). Conclusion CHO mouth rinse neither increased time to exhaustion nor altered energy systems contribution during a high-intensity exercise, but reduced the perceived effort at the exhaustion.

摘要 目的 本研究旨在验证碳水化合物(carbohydrate, CHO)含漱对高强度运动过程中力竭时间、能量系统供能占比以及自觉用力程度分级(rating of perceived exertion, RPE)的影响。 方法 14名男性受试者先后完成递增负荷运动测试,以测定其最大摄氧量与最大功率输出(peak power output, PPO),并完成2次以110%PPO强度进行的力竭运动测试。在力竭测试开始前,受试者分别用25mL 6.4%的CHO溶液或安慰剂(placebo, PLA)溶液进行含漱,实验采用交叉设计。能量系统供能占比通过免费软件GEDAE-LaB®计算得出。 结果 两组受试者的力竭时间无显著差异(CHO组:174.3±42.8s;安慰剂组:166.7±26.3s;p=0.33)。此外,CHO组与安慰剂组在有氧供能(CHO组:135.1±41.2kJ,安慰剂组:129.8±35.3kJ;p=0.34)、乳酸能无氧供能(CHO组:57.6±17.1kJ,安慰剂组:53.4±15.1kJ;p=0.10)以及非乳酸能无氧供能(CHO组:10.4±8.4kJ,安慰剂组:13.2±9.2kJ;p=0.37)方面均无显著差异。总能量消耗同样无组间差异(CHO组:203.2±46.4kJ,安慰剂组:196.5±45.2kJ;p=0.15)。但CHO含漱可降低力竭时刻的RPE评分(CHO组:18.2±1.0分,安慰剂组:19.1±1.1分;p=0.02)。 结论 高强度运动过程中,CHO含漱既未延长力竭时间,也未改变能量系统的供能占比,但可降低受试者力竭时的自觉用力程度。
创建时间:
2017-12-01
二维码
社区交流群
二维码
科研交流群
商业服务