five

Marking and Making Difference Appendix D: Early Proto Database

收藏
DataONE2016-04-30 更新2024-06-26 收录
下载链接:
https://search.dataone.org/view/doi:10.6067:XCV8XW4M4D_meta$v=1462053037875
下载链接
链接失效反馈
官方服务:
资源简介:
Appendices A,B,C,D,E contain the data used in: Marking and Masking Differences: Representational Diversity in the U.S. Southwest. Published in American Antiquity 81(2), 2016, pp. 253-272. By Michelle Hegmon, Jacob Freeman, Keith W. Kintigh, Margaret C. Nelson, Sarah Oas, Matthew A. Peeples, and Andrea Torvinen The paper is based on data from the Cibola region of the US Southwest, and each (.xlsx) file includes the data for a given time period (Pueblo III, Early Pueblo IV, Late Pueblo IV, Early Prothistoric, Late Protohistoric). The periods are explained in the article. Each file includes the following sheets: Apportioned Counts – These are “counts” of each ceramic ware, apportioned to that time period following procedures described briefly in the text and in more detail by Roberts et al (2012). These are ordered by the TOTAL in the last column. The SWSN_ID is the ID# assigned by the Southwest Social Networks project (Mills et al. 2013). The Subregion is that used in our analysis. A brief description of the SWSN project and a list of all wares are available at http://www.archaeologysouthwest.org/swsn. Proportions by Area – These are the same data, including only sites with sample sizes of 40 or more for the given time period. On this sheet they are organized by subregion and the data have been transformed into proportions (i.e., fraction of row total). The final two columns C and SimDiv (1-C) are the diversity measures explained in the article. In addition, Appendix A has a third sheet Sample size effect. This shows the proportions for all sites and includes graphs that show how sample size affects the diversity measures. References Mills, Barbara J., Jeffery J. Clark, Matthew A. Peeples, W. R. Haas, Jr., John M. Roberts, Jr., J. Brett Hill, Deborah L. Huntley, Lewis Borck, Ronald L. Breiger, Aaron Clauset, and M. Steven Shackley 2013 Transformation of social networks in the late pre-Hispanic US Southwest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(15): 5785-5790. Roberts Jr, John M., Barbara J. Mills, Jeffery J. Clark, W. Randall Haas Jr, Deborah L. Huntley, and Meaghan A. Trowbridge 2012 A method for chronological apportioning of ceramic assemblages. Journal of Archaeological Science 39(5):1513-1520.

附录A、B、C、D、E收录了下述研究使用的相关数据: 《标记与差异表征:美国西南部的表征多样性》(Marking and Masking Differences: Representational Diversity in the U.S. Southwest),发表于《美国古物》(American Antiquity)2016年第81卷第2期,页码范围253-272,作者为Michelle Hegmon、Jacob Freeman、Keith W. Kintigh、Margaret C. Nelson、Sarah Oas、Matthew A. Peeples及Andrea Torvinen。 本研究依托美国西南部锡沃拉(Cibola)地区的考古数据,每个(.xlsx)文件对应一个特定考古时段的数据,分别为普韦布洛三世时期(Pueblo III)、普韦布洛早期四世时期(Early Pueblo IV)、普韦布洛晚期四世时期(Late Pueblo IV)、早期前历史时期(Early Prothistoric)与晚期前历史时期(Late Protohistoric),各时段的详细说明见论文正文。 每个文件包含以下工作表: 1. 分摊计数表(Apportioned Counts):该表记录了各陶瓷器类的计数数据,依据文中简述、Roberts等人(2012)详述的年代分摊方法,将其划归至对应时段。数据按最后一列的总计数排序,其中SWSN_ID为西南社会网络项目(Southwest Social Networks project,Mills et al. 2013)分配的编号,Subregion(子区域)为本研究分析中采用的分区。西南社会网络项目的简要介绍及所有器类列表可访问网址http://www.archaeologysouthwest.org/swsn。 2. 区域占比表(Proportions by Area):该表使用与上表完全一致的数据,但仅纳入对应时段样本量≥40的考古遗址。数据按子区域组织,并转换为占比形式(即各数据占所在行总计数的分数比例)。最后两列C与SimDiv(1-C)为论文中阐释的多样性测度指标。 此外,附录A额外包含第三个工作表“样本量效应”(Sample size effect),该表展示了所有遗址的占比数据,并配有图表阐释样本量对多样性测度指标的影响。 参考文献 [1] Mills, Barbara J. 等,2013,《美国西南部前西班牙殖民晚期的社会网络转型》,《美国国家科学院院刊》(Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)110(15): 5785-5790。 [2] Roberts Jr, John M. 等,2012,《陶瓷组合的年代分摊方法》,《考古科学杂志》(Journal of Archaeological Science)39(5):1513-1520。
创建时间:
2016-04-30
5,000+
优质数据集
54 个
任务类型
进入经典数据集
二维码
社区交流群

面向社区/商业的数据集话题

二维码
科研交流群

面向高校/科研机构的开源数据集话题

数据驱动未来

携手共赢发展

商业合作