SPEST questionnaires and student feedback scores for each section

Student feedback for the introduction of structured physical examination skills at KIST Medical College, Nepal derived from an SPEST questionnaire for both students and faculty. Only student data is shown as the faculty SPEST results are mainly qualitative.

1st data file: Scores were provided out of 5 for questions i-vii (1=strongly disagree; 5=strongly agree), whilst the overall score for each section was given out of 10 (1 being poor and 10 being excellent).

2nd data file: Proportion of students for each score provided in response to the questions "I would rate the session........on a scale of 1 to 10 (1 being the least and 10 being the most important)”.

3rd data file: Proportions of students preferring either the tutorial, demonstration, practice or all three sub-sessions for each session.

本数据集源自尼泊尔KIST医学院（KIST Medical College）针对引入结构化体格检查技能培训所开展的学生与教职员工反馈调查，所用问卷为SPEST问卷（SPEST questionnaire），本次仅展示学生端数据，教职员工的SPEST调研结果以质性内容为主。

1. 第一份数据文件：针对问题i至vii的评分采用5分制（满分5分，1分代表完全不同意，5分代表完全同意），各模块的总分为10分制（满分10分，1分表示极差，10分表示优秀）。

2. 第二份数据文件：针对问题「我会将本次培训课程评为……，评分范围为1至10分（1分代表最不重要，10分代表最重要）」，展示了各评分对应的学生占比分布情况。

3. 第三份数据文件：展示了各培训场次中学生偏好辅导课、演示教学、实操练习或全部三类子环节的占比分布。