Supporting information of a study for the definition and evaluation of a graphical user interface for housing co-design

This dataset is from a study that intends to define, prototype and test a graphical user interface for a housing co-design system. To define the requirements of the interface, we conducted interviews with professionals of architecture, urbanism and social sciences areas, as well as with housing cooperatives and inhabitants of these institutions. An interface solution was prototyped, tested and refined. Then we conducted a heuristic evaluation and a summative evaluation. Such evaluations involved the testing of a high-fidelity prototype, to receive feedback from UX/UI experts, potential users (inhabitants) and architects. S1_File refers to the interview protocol used with the three groups of interviewees. We share the English and Portuguese versions of the interviews with professionals and the original (Portuguese) and translated versions of the remaining ones since these were conducted in Portuguese. S2_File is a dataset reporting the results of the interviews. Each question includes the answers given and the identification (anonymized) of the interviewees who responded to that question. S3_File describes the usability issues identified by the experts during the heuristic evaluation of the high-fidelity prototype. The first page organizes the issues by severity (left) and priority (right). The remaining pages have a table for each issue, including rows for problem designation, heuristic violated, problem description, solution proposal, severity degree, and an image of the interface pointing to the referred issue. S4_File refers to the results of the heuristic evaluation. It includes the identification of each issue, which expert (anonymized) identified such issue, and the heuristic it violates, with the sum of the times each heuristic was violated at the end of each column. At the right, a table presents the consolidation of issues, organized by priority, with columns identifying the issue, severity level, frequency, and priority. S5_File is the script given to potential users to experiment with the interface during the summative evaluation. This script guides the user through the tasks to perform since the prototype does not have all the features functioning. S6_File refers to the questionnaires applied during the summative evaluation with inhabitants. It includes a preliminary questionnaire, a Single Ease Question (SEQ) questionnaire, a System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire, and a Graphical User Interface (GUI) questionnaire. S7_File refers to the results of the summative evaluation with inhabitants (potential users). Page A refers to the preliminary questionnaire with demographic information such as age, gender, education, relationship with digital technologies, etc. Each field corresponds with each inhabitant (anonymised) and the sum and percentage. In the middle, a table presents a summary of the consolidation. In the right possible relations are presented. Page B presents the results of the SEQ questionnaire, identifying the ratings each inhabitant (anonymized) gave each task. A summary of such values is at the right. On page C, the result of each rating for the SUS questionnaire given by each inhabitant (anonymized) is shown. At the bottom is the calculation of the SUS score. Page D presents the GUI questionnaire results for each inhabitant (anonymized), with the average and SD identified for each question. A summary of such results is on the right. Page E holds the notes taken by the researchers based on their observations regarding task performance. The information is organized in tables for each step of each task and includes the completeness, attempts, and time taken for each inhabitant (anonymized) to complete such task. Also, the sum, percentage, average, and SD are registered. Next to each task is a table identifying how many participants accomplished the task at the first attempt. Page F refers to the strong and weak aspects identified by the inhabitants. Strong and weak aspects are identified, as well as which inhabitant (anonymized) has identified them. The sum and percentage are also given. At the right, there is a table with the consolidation of results by combining similar answers. S8_File refers to the results of the discussion with architects after experiencing the interface. Such results relate to the positive and negative aspects that the architects identified in the interface and its usefulness for architecture. The left table identifies the strong and weak aspects that architects (anonymized) identified and the sum and percentage associated with them. The table on the right consolidates such results, with similar responses combined.本数据集源自一项旨在定义、原型开发并测试面向住宅协同设计系统的图形用户界面（Graphical User Interface，GUI）的研究。为明确该界面的需求，研究团队访谈了建筑、城市规划与社会科学领域的专业人士，以及住宅合作社及其住户。研究团队完成了一款界面解决方案的原型开发、测试与优化。随后开展了启发式评估与总结性评估：两类评估均基于高保真原型展开，以收集UX/UI专家、潜在用户（即住宅合作社住户）与建筑师的反馈意见。 S1_文件对应面向三组访谈对象的访谈提纲。针对专业人士的访谈内容同时提供英文与葡萄牙语版本；其余访谈均以葡萄牙语开展，故仅提供原始葡萄牙语版本与对应的翻译版本。 S2_文件为访谈结果数据集，每条记录对应一个访谈问题，包含该问题的所有受访回复，以及对应受访人的匿名标识。 S3_文件记录了专家在高保真原型启发式评估过程中发现的可用性问题。文档首页按严重程度（左侧列）与优先级（右侧列）对问题进行分类；其余每页均为单个问题的详情表格，包含问题编号、违反的启发式原则、问题描述、解决方案建议、严重程度等级，以及指向该问题的界面截图。 S4_文件包含启发式评估的结果，涵盖每个问题的标识、发现该问题的专家（匿名）、其违反的启发式原则，且每列末尾均统计了对应启发式原则被违反的总次数。文档右侧设有汇总表格，按优先级对问题进行整理，表格列包含问题编号、严重程度等级、出现频次与优先级。 S5_文件为总结性评估阶段中，供潜在用户体验界面的操作脚本。由于该原型尚未实现全部功能，该脚本将引导用户完成预设的测试任务。 S6_文件对应针对住户开展的总结性评估所用的全套问卷，包含人口统计学初步问卷、单题易用性问卷（Single Ease Question，SEQ）、系统可用性量表（System Usability Scale，SUS）以及图形用户界面（GUI）问卷。 S7_文件包含针对住户（即潜在用户）开展的总结性评估的结果。 页面A对应人口统计学初步问卷，涵盖年龄、性别、受教育程度、数字技术使用情况等信息。每条记录对应一位匿名住户的问卷数据，并附有各项统计结果的总和与占比。文档中部设有汇总统计表格，右侧则展示了各变量间的潜在关联。 页面B展示了单题易用性问卷（SEQ）的调研结果，记录了每位匿名住户针对每项测试任务给出的评分，右侧附有该评分的汇总统计结果。 页面C展示了每位匿名住户填写的系统可用性量表（SUS）的单项评分，页面底部附有SUS总分的计算过程与结果。 页面D展示了每位匿名住户的GUI问卷调研结果，包含各题项的平均值与标准差（Standard Deviation，SD），右侧附有该结果的汇总统计。 页面E为研究人员基于测试观察记录的任务执行情况笔记。文档按每项任务的执行步骤设置表格，记录了每位匿名住户完成任务的完成度、尝试次数与耗时，并附有各项统计的总和、占比、平均值与标准差。每项任务旁均设有表格，统计了首次尝试即完成任务的参与者人数。 页面F汇总了住户提出的界面优劣点：记录了各项优劣点的具体内容、提出该观点的匿名住户，以及各项观点的出现次数与占比。右侧设有合并了同类回答的结果汇总表格。 S8_文件包含建筑师体验界面后开展讨论的结果，内容涵盖建筑师对该界面的优劣评价，以及该界面在建筑设计场景中的应用价值。左侧表格记录了每位匿名建筑师提出的优劣观点及其出现次数与占比，右侧表格则合并同类回答，对结果进行汇总整理。