Japanese Expressions Dataset from Human Rights Infringement on Internet

Japanese Expressions Dataset from Human Rights Infringement on Internet これは、言語処理学会2023において”<strong>権利侵害と不快さの間:日本語人権侵害表現データセット</strong>”の発表で用いた、誹謗中傷等の表現を集めたデータセットです。 仕様は変更される可能性があります Release Date Version 0.1 2023/03/09 Version 0.2 2023/06/01 1.調査対象 民事事件 発信者情報開示請求事件 損害賠償等請求事件 インターネット上の投稿による人権侵害を争った事件よりこのデータセットは作成されています。 Annotation Scheme 1: Text in Dispute Text in Dispute is transcribed from the list of articles submitted or the facts and reasons section of the court cases.<br> This text is what the plaintiff alleges is infringing his or her rights.<br> <br> For example, we use the tag [Plaintiff] for descriptions related to plaintiffs, the tag [Defandant] for descriptions related to defandantss and [Third Party] for any mention of third parties.<br> The tag [Other] is designated for texts involving anonymized place names and any other content not covered by the preceding tags. <br> If distinguishing between tags proves challenging, we advise the use of [Other]. <br> Should a URL be present in the text, it is substituted with the [URL] tag. 2: Context Utilized in Adjudication In some cases, the history of the conversation and previous postings are taken into account in determining whether or not an infringement has occurred.<br> Such text is transcribed from the fact-finding and judgment portions of the court case.<br> Contextual information that can be used for tasks other than proper understanding of the issue and accurate learning and classification.<br> Anonymization is applied in the same way as for [1: Text in Dispute]. 3: Allegedly Infringed Right and Judgement on the Infringement Allegation This category provides a label indicating the types of personal rights infringement complained of by the plaintiff against Text in Dispute and whether or not the infringement of that right was recognized by the trial court.<br> If there are more than two types of infringement of rights complained of by the plaintiff against one text, up to two labels are given. 3-1a: The types of Allegedly Infringed Right 1 Labels are assigned from the above types of personal rights, the right of reputation, the sense of honor, the right of peaceful private life, and other personal rights, from the complaint of infringement of rights by the plaintiff. 3-1b: Judgement on the Infringement Allegation 1 This category indicates whether the trial court granted the plaintiff's complaint against the text under consideration.<br> The annotator reads the result of the Judgement for each case from the court's judgment in the case.<br> If we find that the court has admitted the plaintiff's claim, we assign "1" label to the case concerning the infringement of personal rights.<br> If we find that the court has dismissed the plaintiff's claim, we assign "0" label to those cases that are not infringing.<br> We assign the label "UNJUDGE" to cases where we cannot find the court's Judgement. <br> This appears in cases where the plaintiff alleges multiple infringements and only one of the claims is adjudicated, or where the complaint is found to have been dismissed based on factors other than a determination of infringement by textual expression. 3-2a &amp; b:The types of Allegedly Infringed Right and Judgement on the Infringement Allegation 2 If two infringements are complained of, the annotator assigns a label for the second right. <br> 4: Index Information of Court Cases This section contains information about the cited court case. 4-1: Case Number This is the case number of the court case and the court in which the case was argued. 4-2: Case Name This is the case name of the court case and the court in which the case was argued.<br> Either a case requesting for disclosure of sender's information. or a case requesting compensation for damages is applicable. 4-3: Bibliography This is the bibliography of the cited case. 4-4: Article Number This is the number assigned to Text in Dispute in the court case. 4-5: Online Platform If the online platform where Text in Dispute is explicitly indicated in the court case, it is stated.<br> Since the form of the text and context differs from platform to platform, considering the uniqueness of each service is an important factor to be taken into account.互联网人权侵害相关日语表达数据集（Japanese Expressions Dataset from Human Rights Infringement on Internet） 本数据集为语言处理学会2023年会中发表的《权利侵害与不适感之间：日语人权侵害表达数据集》所使用的诽谤、中伤等表达集合。数据集规格可能发生变更。 发布信息： 版本0.1（2023/03/09）、版本0.2（2023/06/01） 1. 调研对象 本数据集源自针对互联网投稿引发的人权侵害争议的民事案件、发送者信息披露请求案件以及损害赔偿请求案件。 标注方案（Annotation Scheme） 1. 争议文本（Text in Dispute） 争议文本源自提交的文章列表或法院案件的事实与理由部分。该文本即原告主张侵害其权利的内容。示例中，与原告相关的描述使用标签[原告（Plaintiff）]，与被告相关的描述使用标签[被告（Defendant）]，提及第三方时使用标签[第三方（Third Party）]；涉及匿名地名及前述标签未涵盖的其他内容时，使用标签[其他（Other）]。若难以区分标签归属，建议使用[其他（Other）]。若文本中包含URL，将其替换为[URL]标签。 2. 裁判相关语境（Context Utilized in Adjudication） 在判断是否构成侵权时，有时需要结合对话历史及此前的投稿内容。此类文本源自法院案件的事实认定与判决部分。该语境信息可用于除准确理解争议问题、开展精准学习与分类之外的其他任务。匿名化处理规则与“1. 争议文本”部分一致。 3. 涉嫌侵害的权利类型及侵权主张的裁判结果（Allegedly Infringed Right and Judgement on the Infringement Allegation） 本类别为针对争议文本，标注原告主张的人格权（personal rights）侵害类型，以及一审法院是否认定该权利遭到侵害。若原告针对单条文本主张超过两种侵害类型，则最多标注两个标签。 3-1a: 涉嫌侵害的权利类型1 标签从原告主张的人格权类型中选取，包括名誉权（right of reputation）、荣誉权（sense of honor）、私生活安宁权（right of peaceful private life）及其他人格权。 3-1b: 侵权主张的裁判结果1 本类别表示一审法院是否支持原告针对涉案文本的主张。标注人员需从案件的法院判决中读取每起案件的裁判结果：若法院采信原告的诉讼请求，则针对该人格权侵权案件标注标签“1”；若法院驳回原告的诉讼请求，则针对不构成侵权的案件标注标签“0”；若无法获取法院的裁判结果，则标注标签“UNJUDGE”。该情况出现在原告主张多项侵权且仅其中一项得到裁判，或法院基于文本表达之外的因素驳回原告诉求的场景中。 3-2a & 3-2b: 涉嫌侵害的权利类型2及侵权主张的裁判结果2 若原告主张两项侵权行为，标注人员需为第二项权利分配标签。 4. 法院案件索引信息（Index Information of Court Cases） 本部分包含所引用法院案件的相关信息。 4-1 案件编号（Case Number） 本项为法院案件的编号以及受理案件的法院。 4-2 案件名称（Case Name） 本项为法院案件的名称以及受理案件的法院。适用案件类型包括发送者信息披露请求案件或损害赔偿请求案件。 4-3 参考文献（Bibliography） 本项为所引用案件的参考文献信息。 4-4 条文编号（Article Number） 本项为争议文本在法院案件中被分配的编号。 4-5 在线平台（Online Platform） 若法院案件中明确标注了争议文本所在的在线平台，则予以说明。由于不同平台的文本及语境形式存在差异，需充分考虑各服务的独特性，这是需重点考量的重要因素。